http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1812

           Summary: DDOC - Unicode identifiers are not correctly marked.
           Product: D
           Version: 1.026
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: ddoc
          Severity: major
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: bugzilla@digitalmars.com
        ReportedBy: burton-radons@shaw.ca


If a D identifier contains Unicode (such as führer), it will not be correctly marked by DDOC, presumably because DDOC's way of finding identifiers was not upgraded when D started allowing Unicode identifiers. Since there is no reasonable workaround, I've given it major severity. The two attachments are the source (in UTF-8) and the documentation produced from "dmd -D test.d".


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1812





------- Comment #1 from burton-radons@shaw.ca  2008-01-30 15:28 -------
Created an attachment (id=222)
 --> (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=222&action=view)
UTF-8 source code showing the problem.


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1812





------- Comment #2 from burton-radons@shaw.ca  2008-01-30 15:28 -------
Created an attachment (id=223)
 --> (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=223&action=view)
Documentation produced by "dmd -D test.d".


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1812





------- Comment #3 from matti.niemenmaa+dbugzilla@iki.fi  2008-01-31 01:12 -------
Looking at the attachments, it seems to work. What's the expected output?

BTW, DDoc is (a lot) newer than D's support for Unicode identifiers.


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1812





------- Comment #4 from burton-radons@shaw.ca  2008-01-31 01:27 -------
What you should see is that the first fuhrer is underlined, but the second is not, because it's not converted into a DDOC_DECL.

And hm, you're right - DDoc was 0.132, while Unicode identifiers was 0.74. I guess I just noticed them in the opposite order.


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1812





------- Comment #5 from matti.niemenmaa+dbugzilla@iki.fi  2008-01-31 15:48 -------
I see, I didn't notice the missing underlining at all. Right you are, a bug it is.


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1812





------- Comment #6 from unknown@simplemachines.org  2009-03-29 23:45 -------
Created an attachment (id=304)
 --> (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=304&action=view)
Use Unicode parsing for identifiers.

This patch makes DDoc use Unicode to parse identifiers, which makes it properly match them in the doc comments and etc.

-[Unknown]


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1812


Ali Cehreli <acehreli@yahoo.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |acehreli@yahoo.com


--- Comment #7 from Ali Cehreli <acehreli@yahoo.com> 2009-09-17 12:03:31 PDT ---
Wanted to add that function parameters with unicode characters don't appear in the generated documentation as well.

/**
 * BUG: The parameters are not listed under Params in the generated output
 *
 * Params:
 *     ü = first
 *     ş = second
 *     ğ = third
 *
 */
int foo(int ü, int ş, int ğ)
{
    return ğ;
}

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1812


Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


--- Comment #8 from Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> 2009-11-06 11:29:43 PST ---
Fixed dmd 1.051 and 2.036

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------