Thread overview
[Issue 19061] Specs for contracts don't include the changes brought by DIP 1009
Jul 05, 2018
Basile B.
Jul 05, 2018
Seb
Jul 11, 2018
b2.temp@gmx.com
Aug 15, 2018
Seb
July 05, 2018
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19061

Basile B. <b2.temp@gmx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |19062


Referenced Issues:

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19062
[Issue 19062] Accepted grammar for DIP 1009 introduces the `InExpression` which
already exists
--
July 05, 2018
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19061

Seb <greeenify@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |greeenify@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Seb <greeenify@gmail.com> ---
It has been stuck in the queue for a while to a problem with the docs generation: https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/pull/2339

--
July 11, 2018
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19061
Issue 19061 depends on issue 19062, which changed state.

Issue 19062 Summary: Accepted grammar for DIP 1009 introduces the `InExpression` which already exists https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19062

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--
August 15, 2018
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19061

Seb <greensunny12@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |greensunny12@gmail.com
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from Seb <greensunny12@gmail.com> ---
The PR has been merged for a while now, but it didn't mention this issue and thus this issue wasn't auto-closed. Closing..

--