https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19871

Atila Neves <atila.neves@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |C++, diagnostic, ice,
                   |                            |ice-on-valid-code

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19871

RazvanN <razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from RazvanN <razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com> ---
The correct behavior here should be an error that you cannot define both the rvalue constructor and the lvalue constructor (copy constructor). For more information, see: https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8688#discussion_r248601249

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19871

Dlang Bot <dlang-bot@dlang.rocks> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |pull

--- Comment #2 from Dlang Bot <dlang-bot@dlang.rocks> ---
@RazvanN7 created dlang/dmd pull request #9792 "Fix Issue 19871 - Copy constructor rejects valid code if default construction is disabled" fixing this issue:

- Fix Issue 19871 - Copy constructor rejects valid code if default construction is disabled

https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/9792

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19871

--- Comment #3 from RazvanN <razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com> ---
*** Issue 19872 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19871

--- Comment #4 from Atila Neves <atila.neves@gmail.com> ---
I disagree wholeheartedly that it should be the correct behaviour. I'm pasting the same comment again here so it doesn't get lost.

I missed this discussion originally. The reason one one wants to have:

```d
struct Foo {
    this(ref Foo);
    this(Foo);
}
```

is simple: C++ interop. I made it so that the dpp translations actually enabled D code to call a C++ move constructor by overloading on this.

More importantly, D should be able to do what C++ does without needing rvalue references. So the equivalent of this should be possible:


-----------------------
struct Foo {
    Foo(const Foo& foo); // copy ctor
    Foo(Foo&& foo); // move ctor
};
-----------------------

As you can imagine, any and all types that have been updated post C++11 that had copy constructors now have move constructors. Which I'd declare in D how, exactly?

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19871

--- Comment #5 from RazvanN <razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Atila Neves from comment #4)
> I disagree wholeheartedly that it should be the correct behaviour. I'm pasting the same comment again here so it doesn't get lost.
> 
> I missed this discussion originally. The reason one one wants to have:
> 
> ```d
> struct Foo {
>     this(ref Foo);
>     this(Foo);
> }
> ```
> 
> is simple: C++ interop. I made it so that the dpp translations actually enabled D code to call a C++ move constructor by overloading on this.
> 
> More importantly, D should be able to do what C++ does without needing rvalue references. So the equivalent of this should be possible:
> 
> 
> -----------------------
> struct Foo {
>     Foo(const Foo& foo); // copy ctor
>     Foo(Foo&& foo); // move ctor
> };
> -----------------------
> 
> As you can imagine, any and all types that have been updated post C++11 that had copy constructors now have move constructors. Which I'd declare in D how, exactly?

Well, I think that the idea is that opPostMove (DIP1014) would be the solution.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19871

Dlang Bot <dlang-bot@dlang.rocks> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #6 from Dlang Bot <dlang-bot@dlang.rocks> ---
dlang/dmd pull request #9792 "Fix Issue 19871 - Copy constructor rejects valid code if default construction is disabled" was merged into stable:

- 14ae8a4a4bc39ffc1b1b416ece17e5edfc36f49d by RazvanN7:
  Fix Issue 19871 - Copy constructor rejects valid code if default construction
is disabled

https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/9792

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19871

Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://issues.dlang.org/sh
                   |                            |ow_bug.cgi?id=23036

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19871

Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://issues.dlang.org/sh
                   |                            |ow_bug.cgi?id=19931

--