http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2002

           Summary: Add keyword for a function definition
           Product: D
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: bugzilla@digitalmars.com
        ReportedBy: gaboonviper@gmx.net


Like C and C++, D doesn't have a keyword for function definitions. In C you can get away with it, since it's a simple language with few possibilities. The complexity of the C++ and D languages make this approach unsuitable.

Adding a function definition keyword makes the language easier to read. Consider the following function definition:

int doSomething(int someParam)
{
  ...
}

against

function int doSomething(int someParam)
{
  ...
}

For the second function definition it's immediatly clear that we're declaring a function here. No need for second glances, this is definitely a function. The first one on the other is not as intuitive, except perhaps for C/C++ programmers.

While for a simple function the readability improvement may be marginal. When we consider storage classes and type modifiers, the keyword's influence is much bigger.

private static const int doSomething(int someParam){}

vs

private static const function int doSomething(int someParam){}

In the first declaration it's a game of 'what belongs to who', whereas the declaration with the function keyword is a lot more expressive. And with some good syntax highlighting its effect will be even larger.

It's also more consistent with the rest of D syntax. Especially if you'd ommit the void type, which the keyword would make possible.

struct X;
class X;
template X();
function X();
macro X();

So basically using a function definition keyword will decrease the learning curve needed for D. It will increase the readability of D code. And it could possibly make it easier to parse.

I hope you will consider implementing it.

Cheers,
Boyd van Oosterhout


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2002





------- Comment #1 from brunodomedeiros+bugz@gmail.com  2008-04-26 12:58 -------
This proposal is too fresh from the NG. It had little discussion, and received little to no support (other than yourself).

vote-


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2002





------- Comment #2 from gaboonviper@gmx.net  2008-04-26 13:24 -------
Yes, that's why I posted it here. On the newsgroup there wasn't much of a reaction. What reaction there was, was moderately positive, not too enthousiastic though.

Here it can either be permanently rejected, left alone until more pressing matters are resolved, or discussed on a more longterm basis. The newsgroup simply isn't suitable for that.

Cheers,
Boyd


--