Thread overview |
---|
June 16, 2006 [Issue 201] New: the source for etc.gamma is not in the download | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=201 Summary: the source for etc.gamma is not in the download Product: D Version: 0.160 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Phobos AssignedTo: bugzilla@digitalmars.com ReportedBy: clugdbug@yahoo.com.au ..but it's in the makefile, and it's compiled into phobos.lib. It's also mentioned in the comments in std.math, so I presume it's supposed to be included in etc (though maybe not in the phobos lib). Currently the only thing it does it make it difficult to build phobos! Since I wrote this code, I felt obliged to tidy it up a little bit. You can get it from: http://www.dsource.org/projects/mathextra/browser/trunk/mathextra/etcgamma.d (change 'mathextra.etcgamma' to 'etc.gamma'). All references to the file 'realtest.d' should be removed from the makefiles, it was only used during development. -- |
June 23, 2006 [Issue 201] the source for etc.gamma is not in the download | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to d-bugmail | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=201 ------- Comment #1 from lio@lunesu.com 2006-06-23 02:22 ------- Seems the v0.161 distribution contains gamma.d, but the file still refers to realtest. Commenting the import at the top of etc/gamma.d solves the problem, and Phobos now builds out of the box! -- |
October 10, 2006 [Issue 201] the source for etc.gamma is not in the download | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to d-bugmail | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=201 clugdbug@yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Comment #2 from clugdbug@yahoo.com.au 2006-10-10 08:27 ------- I'm changing this to FIXED, since the original problem is gone. There's a new, trivial bug (the import of module realtest), but it's probably better to file that seperately. -- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation