https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23779

RazvanN <razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from RazvanN <razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com> ---
The UFCS implementation is already very complex, why would we add another special case?

This needs to be a accompanied by strong rationale to have any chances of being accepted.

If we were to implement anything, I would rather go the other way around and implement automatic dereferencing with UFCS not automatic address taking. However, I would argue that we should not complicate UFCS any further.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23779

Basile-z <b2.temp@gmx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |b2.temp@gmx.com
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #2 from Basile-z <b2.temp@gmx.com> ---
what is requested here is an implict conversion from a `D` to a `D*` based on lvaluness.

It is not very well described, and maybe a second attempt would be better, so close as "invalid" for the moment.

--