Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 06, 2010 [Issue 4281] New: AA literal problem with mutable array as key | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4281 Summary: AA literal problem with mutable array as key Product: D Version: future Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: bearophile_hugs@eml.cc --- Comment #0 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2010-06-06 05:03:25 PDT --- This D2 code seems correct: void main() { int[int[]] aa = [[1]: 2]; } But DMD v2.046 prints at compile-time: test.d(2): comma expected separating array initializers, not : test.d(2): semicolon expected, not '3' test.d(2): found ']' when expecting ';' following 'statement' See also Bug 4279 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
June 06, 2010 [Issue 4281] AA literal problem with mutable array as key | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile_hugs@eml.cc | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4281 --- Comment #1 from Ellery Newcomer <ellery-newcomer@utulsa.edu> 2010-06-06 08:00:00 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=656) mind a bit more lookahead? your code looks fine. dmd's parser doesn't honor the second line in ArrayMemberInitialization: NonVoidInitializer AssignExpression : NonVoidInitializer for array literals. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
October 21, 2012 [Issue 4281] AA literal problem with mutable array as key | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile_hugs@eml.cc | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4281 Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> 2012-10-21 13:25:31 PDT --- It compiles now, although I'm not sure if such a key should be allowed.. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
October 21, 2012 [Issue 4281] AA literal problem with mutable array as key | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile_hugs@eml.cc | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4281 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2012-10-21 13:51:00 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > It compiles now, although I'm not sure if such a key should be allowed.. The type of the key of this associative array is actually "const int[]", despite the type signature says something different... So the keys are OK. It's the associative array type signature that is not good. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation