Thread overview | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
August 17, 2010 [Issue 4659] New: lockstep <=> zip names | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4659 Summary: lockstep <=> zip names Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Phobos AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: bearophile_hugs@eml.cc --- Comment #0 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2010-08-17 04:58:17 PDT --- I have already tried and appreciated lockstep() (and few successive updates): http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1871 But I'd like lockstep() and zip() to have their names swapped, because I think the current lockstep() is more commonly useful in my code, so it's better to give it the shorter name. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
August 17, 2010 [Issue 4659] lockstep <=> zip names | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile_hugs@eml.cc | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4659 Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmdavisProg@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg@gmail.com> 2010-08-17 16:37:48 PDT --- Well, short names are good, but I find lockstep() to be far more descriptive, and zip() does not make me think of what lockstep() does at all. So, personally, I'd prefer to keep the name lockstep(), but I understand why you'd want to change it. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
June 29, 2013 [Issue 4659] lockstep <=> zip names | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile_hugs@eml.cc | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4659 bearophile_hugs@eml.cc changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2013-06-29 03:16:36 PDT --- Wontfix because I think it's better to just deprecate and then remove lockstep(), as discussed in Issue 8155 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation