http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=502

           Summary: reimplementing methods for interface
           Product: D
           Version: 0.173
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: bugzilla@digitalmars.com
        ReportedBy: benoit@tionex.de


http://www.digitalmars.com/d/interface.html
A reimplemented interface must implement all the interface functions, it does
not inherit them from a super class:

interface D{
    int foo();
}
class A : D{
    int foo() { return 1; }
}
class B : A, D{
    alias A.foo foo; // shouldn't this work for the reimplementation ???
}

in DMD 0.173 it doesn't.


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=502


bugzilla@digitalmars.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID




------- Comment #1 from bugzilla@digitalmars.com  2006-11-26 02:33 -------
This is as designed:

"A reimplemented interface must implement all the interface functions, it does not inherit them from a super class:"


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=502





------- Comment #2 from smjg@iname.com  2006-11-26 03:08 -------
The quotation says nothing about whether this is valid code.  It merely states _that_ a class that reimplements an interface must implement the interface functions, not _how_ it may or may not go about doing so.

Hence the comment,
    "shouldn't this work for the reimplementation ???"
i.e. shouldn't this be one way to go about implementing the interface
functions?


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=502


smjg@iname.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         OS/Version|Linux                       |All
         Resolution|INVALID                     |




------- Comment #3 from smjg@iname.com  2007-11-08 08:10 -------
Reopening per lack of response to my last comment, and considering that it's been brought up again.


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=502


smjg@iname.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |davidl@126.com




------- Comment #4 from smjg@iname.com  2007-11-08 08:11 -------
*** Bug 1584 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=502


Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


--- Comment #5 from Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> 2012-01-21 11:18:28 PST ---
An alias is not an implementation.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------