December 03, 2010 [Issue 5312] New: Function redefinition is allowed (duplicate functions) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5312 Summary: Function redefinition is allowed (duplicate functions) Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: bdom.pub+deebugz@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Bruno Medeiros <bdom.pub+deebugz@gmail.com> 2010-12-03 06:32:16 PST --- The following compiles fine in terms of semantic analysis: bool foo() { return false; } bool foo() { return false; } class X { bool foo() { return false; } bool foo() { return false; } } Rather we get two "Previous Definition Different" linker errors. But surely this should be a compiler error, right? (at the semantic level) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
December 04, 2010 [Issue 5312] Function redefinition is allowed (duplicate functions) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Bruno Medeiros | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5312 Stewart Gordon <smjg@iname.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |smjg@iname.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Stewart Gordon <smjg@iname.com> 2010-12-03 17:37:29 PST --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 1003 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation