Thread overview | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 04, 2011 [Issue 5407] New: X86_64: Segfault on AA Foreach | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5407 Summary: X86_64: Segfault on AA Foreach Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: druntime AssignedTo: sean@invisibleduck.org ReportedBy: ibuclaw@ubuntu.com --- Comment #0 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@ubuntu.com> 2011-01-03 21:39:58 PST --- The aligntsize() implementations in aaA.d and object_.d differ, causing a segfault to occur during runtime. Relevant ticket against GDC here: https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/issue/133/segfault-on-aa-foreach And fix has already been committed, can you please sync this into to druntime? https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/changeset/aba6c8857d64 Regards -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
January 04, 2011 [Issue 5407] X86_64: Segfault on AA Foreach | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Iain Buclaw | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5407 Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |braddr@puremagic.com AssignedTo|sean@invisibleduck.org |braddr@puremagic.com --- Comment #1 from Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> 2011-01-03 21:48:35 PST --- Hrm.. why are there two implementations of the function in the first place? I'll take this bug, but what I'd prefer to see is loosing the one in aaA.d and making the one in object.di/object_.d correct. You didn't happen to try that, did you? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
January 04, 2011 [Issue 5407] X86_64: Segfault on AA Foreach | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Iain Buclaw | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5407 --- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@ubuntu.com> 2011-01-03 21:58:07 PST --- The one on object.d is a member of struct AssociativeArray(Key, Value), the other is an internal helper function. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
January 04, 2011 [Issue 5407] X86_64: Segfault on AA Foreach | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Iain Buclaw | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5407 nfxjfg@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nfxjfg@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from nfxjfg@gmail.com 2011-01-03 22:05:09 PST --- By the way, I have already demonstrated with a compiler/runtime patch, that you can have an associative array ABI that works on all architectures and doesn't need that messy alignment stuff (how many bugs did that generate in the past, present and future?). Enjoy your bugs, I guess. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
January 04, 2011 [Issue 5407] X86_64: Segfault on AA Foreach | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Iain Buclaw | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5407 Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> 2011-01-03 22:53:19 PST --- Changes applied in r473. Thanks Iain. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
January 04, 2011 [Issue 5407] X86_64: Segfault on AA Foreach | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Iain Buclaw | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5407 --- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@ubuntu.com> 2011-01-04 05:15:18 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) > By the way, I have already demonstrated with a compiler/runtime patch, that you can have an associative array ABI that works on all architectures and doesn't need that messy alignment stuff (how many bugs did that generate in the past, present and future?). > Would you happen to know where you demonstrated this? :) All I can find ABI-wise on AA's is http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=802 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation