March 29, 2013 [Issue 9830] New: Wrong purity inference for a lambda? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9830 Summary: Wrong purity inference for a lambda? Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: bearophile_hugs@eml.cc --- Comment #0 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2013-03-29 11:44:42 PDT --- I think foo2() too can be pure: void main() { immutable int x; int foo1() pure { return x; } // OK int delegate() pure foo2 = () => x; // error } But DMD 2.063alpha gives: test.d(4): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (__lambda1) of type int delegate() nothrow @safe to int delegate() pure -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation