If `e' is a legal expression, then `( e )' is also one.
But there is no rule for it in the specs.

SO long.

In article <c12eus$7hu$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Manfred Nowak says...
>
>If `e' is a legal expression, then `( e )' is also one.

I don't think that's always true - not sure.
I'll post it if I find it again.

Ant

In article <c12v9c$15ql$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Ant says...
>
>In article <c12eus$7hu$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Manfred Nowak says...
>>
>>If `e' is a legal expression, then `( e )' is also one.
>
>I don't think that's always true - not sure.
>I'll post it if I find it again.
>

oh, no, I think the problem was starting a statment with a "("
(not sure) It was something I expected to be valid...
I'll post it if I find it again.

Ant

Good catch. -Walter

"Manfred Nowak" <svv1999@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c12eus$7hu$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> If `e' is a legal expression, then `( e )' is also one.
> But there is no rule for it in the specs.
>
> SO long.