Thought I'd kick off the new newsgroup with an update! Revamped template internals, support for interface casting, and some nifty new phobos modules.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

Walter wrote:
> Thought I'd kick off the new newsgroup with an update! Revamped template
> internals, support for interface casting, and some nifty new phobos modules.

Cool.

> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

I'm not going to ask where 0.83 and 0.84 went, but what happened to  0.85?

Digital Mars D Compiler v0.86
Copyright (c) 1999-2004 by Digital Mars written by Walter Bright
Documentation: www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html

Is it having an identity crisis?

-- 
Justin
http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/

"J C Calvarese" <jcc7@cox.net> wrote in message news:c6ksu1$3aj$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Walter wrote:
> > Thought I'd kick off the new newsgroup with an update! Revamped template internals, support for interface casting, and some nifty new phobos
modules.
>
> Cool.
>
> >
> > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>
> I'm not going to ask where 0.83 and 0.84 went, but what happened to  0.85?
>
> Digital Mars D Compiler v0.86
> Copyright (c) 1999-2004 by Digital Mars written by Walter Bright
> Documentation: www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html
>
> Is it having an identity crisis?

No. Just think of it as 0.86.

oops, that should be 0.86.

"Walter" <newshound@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:c6kq8k$315s$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Thought I'd kick off the new newsgroup with an update! Revamped template internals, support for interface casting, and some nifty new phobos
modules.
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>
>
>

Walter wrote:
> oops, that should be 0.86.
<snip top of upside-down reply>

OK, now I know I'm not alone in wondering what happened to 0.83 to 0.85.    Are they versions that were circulated to a few but never actually released?

And does te change log list all the changes between 0.82 and 0.86, or only between 0.85 and 0.86?

Stewart.

-- 
My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox, aside from its being the unfortunate victim of intensive mail-bombing at the moment.  Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.

Stewart Gordon wrote:

> OK, now I know I'm not alone in wondering what happened to 0.83 to 0.85.    Are they versions that were circulated to a few but never actually released?
> 

These should be the versions Matthew got for DWT

Walter; you know that these are being ejected?

Max # of fixups = 347
Max # of fixups = 142
Max # of fixups = 130
Max # of fixups = 138
Max # of fixups = 252
Max # of fixups = 248
Max # of fixups = 45
Max # of fixups = 163
Max # of fixups = 204
Max # of fixups = 228
Max # of fixups = 215
Max # of fixups = 233
Max # of fixups = 268
Max # of fixups = 317
Max # of fixups = 33
Max # of fixups = 946
Max # of fixups = 28
Max # of fixups = 27
Max # of fixups = 72
Max # of fixups = 28
Max # of fixups = 18
Max # of fixups = 141
Max # of fixups = 2
Max # of fixups = 4
Max # of fixups = 35
Max # of fixups = 70
Max # of fixups = 61
Max # of fixups = 127
Max # of fixups = 101
Max # of fixups = 91
Max # of fixups = 91
Max # of fixups = 50
Max # of fixups = 339
Max # of fixups = 2
Max # of fixups = 88
Max # of fixups = 58
Max # of fixups = 2
Max # of fixups = 2
Max # of fixups = 50
Max # of fixups = 101
Max # of fixups = 57
Max # of fixups = 62
Max # of fixups = 282
Max # of fixups = 257
Max # of fixups = 46
Max # of fixups = 76
Max # of fixups = 34
Max # of fixups = 155
Max # of fixups = 122

etc ...

Also, Interfaces still have a few gremlins. I have two cases of the same thing whereby the vtable is confused when multiple layers of interfaces are involved. I haven't been able to isolate the problem into a small example, but I can send you Dsc.io and indicate which line to comment-out for the issue to manifest itself ...

- Kris



"Walter" <newshound@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:c6kq8k$315s$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Thought I'd kick off the new newsgroup with an update! Revamped template internals, support for interface casting, and some nifty new phobos
modules.
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>
>
>

It does have:
    - std.etc.c.recls stuff linked in
    - source for mmfile.d
    - loader.d

But what happened to
    - the updated registry.d?
    - the revised loader.d?




"Walter" <newshound@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:c6kq8k$315s$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Thought I'd kick off the new newsgroup with an update! Revamped template internals, support for interface casting, and some nifty new phobos modules.
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>
>
>

"Kris" <someidiot@earthlink.dot.dot.dot.net> wrote in message news:c6m1bf$22g6$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Walter; you know that these are being ejected?
>
> Max # of fixups = 347

Fixed.

> Also, Interfaces still have a few gremlins. I have two cases of the same thing whereby the vtable is confused when multiple layers of interfaces
are
> involved. I haven't been able to isolate the problem into a small example, but I can send you Dsc.io and indicate which line to comment-out for the issue to manifest itself ...

I know it sounds silly, but delete everything that is not part of the bug. These things always boil down.

I'll continue this over in the .bugs section where I should have originally posted :-)

"Walter" <newshound@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:c6mb8n$2k17$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>
> "Kris" <someidiot@earthlink.dot.dot.dot.net> wrote in message news:c6m1bf$22g6$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > Walter; you know that these are being ejected?
> >
> > Max # of fixups = 347
>
> Fixed.
>
> > Also, Interfaces still have a few gremlins. I have two cases of the same thing whereby the vtable is confused when multiple layers of interfaces
> are
> > involved. I haven't been able to isolate the problem into a small
example,
> > but I can send you Dsc.io and indicate which line to comment-out for the issue to manifest itself ...
>
> I know it sounds silly, but delete everything that is not part of the bug. These things always boil down.
>
>