Is there going to be a process_sequence (and maybe module_sequence and thread_sequence) anywhere in the future? near future, maybe?

A very good idea. I've certainly planned such things in general, but just not got round to it.

I'm desperately trying to get 1.7.1 out the door, so I don't want to add anything new. However, if you remind me in a week or so, I'll see what I can do. ;)

"Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c90i2s$2gln$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Is there going to be a process_sequence (and maybe module_sequence and thread_sequence) anywhere in the future? near future, maybe?
>
>

Sure, I'll keep buggin' you, no problem...

> A very good idea. I've certainly planned such things in general, but just
not got
> round to it.
>
> I'm desperately trying to get 1.7.1 out the door, so I don't want to add
anything
> new. However, if you remind me in a week or so, I'll see what I can do. ;)

Cool.

I have several utilities that I've needed to implement/finalise for a long long time, and which could use a nice Win32 process/etc. enumeration, so it could be a nice tying up of requirements.

Just not yet ... ;)

"Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c90nbh$2pke$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Sure, I'll keep buggin' you, no problem...
>
> > A very good idea. I've certainly planned such things in general, but just
> not got
> > round to it.
> >
> > I'm desperately trying to get 1.7.1 out the door, so I don't want to add
> anything
> > new. However, if you remind me in a week or so, I'll see what I can do. ;)
>
>