| Thread overview | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 30, 2017 Another bug? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Code:
import std.stdio;
struct Foo {
int val = 0;
~this() {
writefln("destruct %s", val);
}
}
void bar(ARGS...)() {
ARGS args;
args[0].val = 1;
writefln("val = %s", args[0].val);
}
void main() {
bar!Foo();
}
Excpected output:
val = 1
destruct 1
But got:
destruct 0
val = 1
It seems that the compiler destructs 'args' immediately after definition, not at the end of the function.
| ||||
January 30, 2017 Re: Another bug? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jack Applegame | WORKAROUND:
import std.stdio;
struct Foo {
int val = 0;
~this() {
writefln("destruct %s", val);
}
}
void bar(ARGS...)() {
struct Tuple {
ARGS args;
alias args this;
}
Tuple args;
args[0].val = 1;
writefln("val = %s", args[0].val);
}
void main() {
bar!Foo();
}
| |||
January 30, 2017 Re: Another bug? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jack Applegame | On 01/30/2017 12:55 PM, Jack Applegame wrote:
> Code:
>
> import std.stdio;
> struct Foo {
> int val = 0;
> ~this() {
> writefln("destruct %s", val);
> }
> }
>
> void bar(ARGS...)() {
> ARGS args;
> args[0].val = 1;
> writefln("val = %s", args[0].val);
> }
>
> void main() {
> bar!Foo();
> }
>
> Excpected output:
> val = 1
> destruct 1
>
> But got:
> destruct 0
> val = 1
>
> It seems that the compiler destructs 'args' immediately after
> definition, not at the end of the function.
Yup, looks like a (pretty bad) bug to me.
| |||
January 30, 2017 Re: Another bug? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to ag0aep6g | bug report: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17128 | |||
January 30, 2017 Re: Another bug? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jack Applegame | On Monday, 30 January 2017 at 12:40:44 UTC, Jack Applegame wrote:
> bug report: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17128
LDC (2.070.2) has a different problem: the dtor is never called.
| |||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation
Permalink
Reply