I'd like to give Derek a round of applause for build.exe ~ it sure is a great asset ... Woohoo!

If it works on linux like it does on Win32, then more joy all around.

kris wrote:
> I'd like to give Derek a round of applause for build.exe ~ it sure is a great asset ... Woohoo!
> 
> If it works on linux like it does on Win32, then more joy all around.

Seconded! Good work, Derek!

-JJR

Question to Derek:

If a project's using both D and C sources that must be linked together,
could Build handle the C files and call gcc to compile them ?
Would be cool.

maybe it could parse a pragma(csource,module.c) or something ?

kris wrote:
> I'd like to give Derek a round of applause for build.exe ~ it sure is a great asset ... Woohoo!
> 
> If it works on linux like it does on Win32, then more joy all around.

more joy all around, then ;)

"John Reimer" <brk_6502@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:d0u5e7$1mdl$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> kris wrote:
>> I'd like to give Derek a round of applause for build.exe ~ it sure is a great asset ... Woohoo!
>>
>> If it works on linux like it does on Win32, then more joy all around.
>
> Seconded! Good work, Derek!
>
> -JJR

I "third" it ;)

clayasaurus wrote:
> kris wrote:
> 
>> I'd like to give Derek a round of applause for build.exe ~ it sure is a great asset ... Woohoo!
>>
>> If it works on linux like it does on Win32, then more joy all around.
> 
> 
> more joy all around, then ;)

Indeed. It builds my project just the same on Windows and Linux...with another. Well, excepting including the winsock library on Windows...

-- 
-PIB

--
"C++ also supports the notion of *friends*: cooperative classes that
are permitted to see each other's private parts." - Grady Booch

clayasaurus wrote:

>> I'd like to give Derek a round of applause for build.exe ~ it sure is a great asset ... Woohoo!
>>
>> If it works on linux like it does on Win32, then more joy all around.
> 
> more joy all around, then ;)

With the latest round of patches on the Build forum,
(see http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=52)
it is starting to work with GDC - and Mac OS X too...

Currently I still have to include a redundant DFLAGS
of -I/opt/gdc/include/d for Build to find it, but that
can be fixed with a few better default GDC settings.

--anders

On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:48:17 +0100, G.Vidal wrote:

> Question to Derek:
> 
> If a project's using both D and C sources that must be linked together,
> could Build handle the C files and call gcc to compile them ?
> Would be cool.
> 
> maybe it could parse a pragma(csource,module.c) or something ?

I'll add it to the TODO list, but its not looking good. I don't really know gcc, nor do I think I should hard code any gcc stuff in to build. But for now, its on the radar, okay?

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
13/03/2005 10:30:20 AM

Le Sun, 13 Mar 2005 10:32:15 +1100, Derek Parnell a écrit :

> On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:48:17 +0100, G.Vidal wrote:
> 
>> Question to Derek:
>> 
>> If a project's using both D and C sources that must be linked together,
>> could Build handle the C files and call gcc to compile them ?
>> Would be cool.
>> 
>> maybe it could parse a pragma(csource,module.c) or something ?
> 
> I'll add it to the TODO list, but its not looking good. I don't really know gcc, nor do I think I should hard code any gcc stuff in to build. But for now, its on the radar, okay?

Nevermind. I'll use Make instead.
It'll call gcc, dmd, and all my plugins. With dmd's pragma(lib,"") I don't
need build no more.

Other advantage, Make is universal.

G.Vidal wrote:
> Le Sun, 13 Mar 2005 10:32:15 +1100, Derek Parnell a écrit :
> 
> 
>>On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:48:17 +0100, G.Vidal wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Question to Derek:
>>>
>>>If a project's using both D and C sources that must be linked together,
>>>could Build handle the C files and call gcc to compile them ?
>>>Would be cool.
>>>
>>>maybe it could parse a pragma(csource,module.c) or something ?
>>
>>I'll add it to the TODO list, but its not looking good. I don't really know
>>gcc, nor do I think I should hard code any gcc stuff in to build. But for
>>now, its on the radar, okay?
> 
> 
> Nevermind. I'll use Make instead.
> It'll call gcc, dmd, and all my plugins. With dmd's pragma(lib,"") I don't
> need build no more.
> 
> Other advantage, Make is universal.
> 

Yep, it's so universal that the multitude of make variants rarely are compatible.