class Base
{
        package char[] name ()
        {
                return "base";
        }

        char[] test ()
        {
                return name();
        }
}

class Derived : Base
{
        package override char[] name()
        {
                return "derived";
        }
}

void main()
{
        Derived d = new Derived;

        // fails!
        assert (d.test() == "derived");
}


Derived.test() returns "base" instead of "derived" ... works as expected
with 'protected' etc.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Kris schrieb am Thu, 19 May 2005 17:21:59 -0700:
> class Base
> {
>         package char[] name ()
>         {
>                 return "base";
>         }
>
>         char[] test ()
>         {
>                 return name();
>         }
> }
>
> class Derived : Base
> {
>         package override char[] name()
>         {
>                 return "derived";
>         }
> }
>
> void main()
> {
>         Derived d = new Derived;
>
>         // fails!
>         assert (d.test() == "derived");
> }
>
>
> Derived.test() returns "base" instead of "derived" ... works as expected
> with 'protected' etc.

Added to DStress as http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/o/overload_23.d http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/o/overload_24.d

Thomas


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFCjdI33w+/yD4P9tIRAlZRAJoDgHjplaFgdrcS2hl+Im4d8aq/xQCeL/i2
hyLWrLWVSuOUmtplg0qhR0M=
=Lxge
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

"Kris" <fu@bar.com> wrote in message news:d6jaj8$2r1n$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Derived.test() returns "base" instead of "derived" ... works as expected
> with 'protected' etc.

This is as designed - 'private' and 'package' functions are not virtual.

Thanks for the clarification.

Private, sure. Package? That's a tad unexpected. I guess I must have missed that in the documentation?



"Walter" <newshound@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:d6lgva$1kd0$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>
> "Kris" <fu@bar.com> wrote in message
news:d6jaj8$2r1n$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > Derived.test() returns "base" instead of "derived" ... works as expected
> > with 'protected' etc.
>
> This is as designed - 'private' and 'package' functions are not virtual.
>
>

Kris wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification.
> 
> Private, sure. Package? That's a tad unexpected.

what happened Kris?
lost your fire? ;)

It's absurd! :(

well, not as bad as:
- default on switch (even Walter was caught on this I'm surprised nobody referred it)
- missing return
- == null
- legacy "compatibilities" (case, ~this(), cast...)
- stupid name resolution rules
- ...

:p

See Walter? D is so good that we even put up with these things!
but somehow I always feel like "almost there..." :(

Ant

PS Kris, we are all expecting a 4 pages PDF...

Ant wrote:
> Kris wrote:
> 
>> Thanks for the clarification.
>>
>> Private, sure. Package? That's a tad unexpected.
> 

Hello, Ant ~ Long time!

> what happened Kris?
> lost your fire? ;)
Hell, no. I was just waiting for you <g>

> 
> It's absurd! :(
I'd really like to hear why it /should/ be like it is ... anyone?

<snip>

> PS Kris, we are all expecting a 4 pages PDF...
Better things to do; such as teaching this octopus to waltz, on just two legs :)

Walter wrote:
| "Kris" <fu@bar.com> wrote in message
| news:d6jaj8$2r1n$1@digitaldaemon.com...
|
|> Derived.test() returns "base" instead of "derived" ... works as
|> expected with 'protected' etc.
|
|
| This is as designed - 'private' and 'package' functions are not
| virtual.
|

http://digitalmars.com/d/function.html
All non-static non-private member functions are virtual.

Thomas

lol

"Ant" <duitoolkit@yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:d6mj4f$2bdp$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Kris wrote:
> > Thanks for the clarification.
> >
> > Private, sure. Package? That's a tad unexpected.
>
> what happened Kris?
> lost your fire? ;)
>
> It's absurd! :(
>
> well, not as bad as:
> - default on switch (even Walter was caught on this I'm surprised nobody
referred it)
> - missing return
> - == null
> - legacy "compatibilities" (case, ~this(), cast...)
> - stupid name resolution rules
> - ...
>
> :p
>
> See Walter? D is so good that we even put up with these things! but somehow I always feel like "almost there..." :(
>
> Ant
>
> PS Kris, we are all expecting a 4 pages PDF...