Thread overview
It's possible to declare a variable inside a static foreach()?
Dec 21, 2017
Marc
Dec 21, 2017
Anonymouse
Dec 21, 2017
Seb
December 21, 2017
For example, I'd like to declare a variable inside a static foreach like in below code, just for better organization, otherwise, I have to use the value directly instead of the variable. If the value is used more than once, it might be inviable.

>	enum allMembers = __traits(derivedMembers, C);
>	static foreach(enum string member; allMembers) {		
>		enum attributes = __traits(getAttributes, __traits(getMember, C, member));
>		static foreach(C c; attributes) {
>			writeln(c);
>		}
>	}

I got redefinition erros of "atributes" on this. Can I have this only at compile time?
December 21, 2017
On Thursday, 21 December 2017 at 16:25:00 UTC, Marc wrote:
> For example, I'd like to declare a variable inside a static foreach like in below code, just for better organization, otherwise, I have to use the value directly instead of the variable. If the value is used more than once, it might be inviable.
>
>>	enum allMembers = __traits(derivedMembers, C);
>>	static foreach(enum string member; allMembers) {		
>>		enum attributes = __traits(getAttributes, __traits(getMember, C, member));
>>		static foreach(C c; attributes) {
>>			writeln(c);
>>		}
>>	}
>
> I got redefinition erros of "atributes" on this. Can I have this only at compile time?

I don't think you need static for foreach of __traits allMembers/derivedMembers and .tupleof. It unrolls at compile-time and builds fine for me if I just remove the statics. https://run.dlang.io/is/Ln3kVZ

> /*static*/ foreach(C c; attributes)
Mind that c will not be of type C but of the type of the attribute.
December 21, 2017
On Thursday, 21 December 2017 at 16:38:36 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
> On Thursday, 21 December 2017 at 16:25:00 UTC, Marc wrote:
>> For example, I'd like to declare a variable inside a static foreach like in below code, just for better organization, otherwise, I have to use the value directly instead of the variable. If the value is used more than once, it might be inviable.
>>
>>>	enum allMembers = __traits(derivedMembers, C);
>>>	static foreach(enum string member; allMembers) {		
>>>		enum attributes = __traits(getAttributes, __traits(getMember, C, member));
>>>		static foreach(C c; attributes) {
>>>			writeln(c);
>>>		}
>>>	}
>>
>> I got redefinition erros of "atributes" on this. Can I have this only at compile time?
>
> I don't think you need static for foreach of __traits allMembers/derivedMembers and .tupleof. It unrolls at compile-time and builds fine for me if I just remove the statics. https://run.dlang.io/is/Ln3kVZ
>
>> /*static*/ foreach(C c; attributes)
> Mind that c will not be of type C but of the type of the attribute.


The trick with static foreach is to create a new scope:

https://run.dlang.io/is/wODA0x

DIP1010 [1] suggested __local but while this is implemented, it it's not exposed yet.
There's also a bit of discussion about this at [2].

[1] https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1010.md#local-declarations
[2] https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/5729