| |
 | Posted by pragma in reply to Ramakrishna | Permalink Reply |
|
pragma 
Posted in reply to Ramakrishna
| In article <e0ssav$2pmc$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Ramakrishna says...
>
>
>Hi D-lang Developpers,
>
>I Appreciate your effort in implementing D-language to overcome drawbacks of C and C++. But I have some concerns in this,
>
>1.I don't know Why you are not supporting Multiple Inheritance?
>In C++ way of multiple Inheritance is required ans it is programmer to use also.
While I cannot speak for the exact design decisions behind not supporting MI, I can say that everyone is getting along very well without it. IMO, there are exceedingly few cases where MI actually solves a problem without needlessly complicating things for developers.
D has an amazing feature that functions well as a workaround: mixins. Combining mixins with interfaces will give you most of what you crave from MI, without any of the "what overrides what" issues that C++'s MI implementation gives you. :)
>2.Dynamic class loading is required. Please Include this in your D-language.
The DDL project over on dsource (www.dsource.org/projects/ddl) is moving steadily toward this goal. The intermediate goals of dynamic loading and linking, in a cross-platform manner, are nearly complete which will set the stage nicely for dynamic class loading and true reflection. I have prepared a little more information on things over on the project page itself, so please drop in and take a look.
>I wish this D-language will get more popularity and Wide area of applicable. I wish you all Success, Good luck...
Thank you. Please consider helping us out with making D a success. There are many active projects over on dsource.org that are always in need of testers and contributors. The scene here is pretty friendly - just ask to help!
- EricAnderton at yahoo
|