DMD 1.039 and 2.023 releases

On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Bill Baxter <wbaxter@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/1/7 Walter Bright <newshound1@digitalmars.com>: >> Faster long divides! > > No progress on "faster long compiles" though? > > --bb > The D2 changelog says that he undid the fix to 2500, which might be the cause. But no word on whether it was the cause, or if D1 got the revert as well.

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Jarrett Billingsley <jarrett.billingsley@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Bill Baxter <wbaxter@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2009/1/7 Walter Bright <newshound1@digitalmars.com>: >>> Faster long divides! >> >> No progress on "faster long compiles" though? >> >> --bb >> > > The D2 changelog says that he undid the fix to 2500, which might be the cause. But no word on whether it was the cause, or if D1 got the revert as well. > Guess I'll give it a try then. --bb

On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:53:27 +0300, Walter Bright <newshound1@digitalmars.com> wrote: > Faster long divides! > > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html > http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.039.zip > > > > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html > http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.023.zip Nice! Before you start closing fixed issues, I'd like to ask you add short fix discription wherever possible, because it is sometimes hard to understand what is fixed and how, especially in ambiguous cases. BTW, D1 is 2 years old by now (DMD1.000 was released on January, 2 in 2007). Congratulations!

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Denis Koroskin <2korden@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:53:27 +0300, Walter Bright <newshound1@digitalmars.com> wrote: > >> Faster long divides! >> >> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.039.zip >> >> >> >> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.023.zip > > Nice! > > Before you start closing fixed issues, I'd like to ask you add short fix discription wherever possible, because it is sometimes hard to understand what is fixed and how, especially in ambiguous cases. > > BTW, D1 is 2 years old by now (DMD1.000 was released on January, 2 in 2007). > Congratulations! > > Whoa! I would have believed 1 year. Doesn't seem like 2. --bb

On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:11:52 +0300, Bill Baxter <wbaxter@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Denis Koroskin <2korden@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:53:27 +0300, Walter Bright >> <newshound1@digitalmars.com> wrote: >> >>> Faster long divides! >>> >>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html >>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.039.zip >>> >>> >>> >>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html >>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.023.zip >> >> Nice! >> >> Before you start closing fixed issues, I'd like to ask you add short fix >> discription wherever possible, because it is sometimes hard to understand >> what is fixed and how, especially in ambiguous cases. >> >> BTW, D1 is 2 years old by now (DMD1.000 was released on January, 2 in 2007). >> Congratulations! >> >> > > Whoa! I would have believed 1 year. Doesn't seem like 2. > > --bb It will be a year for D2 in ten days.

January 07, 2009

Re: DMD 1.039 and 2.023 releases

Posted by Denis Koroskin
in reply to Denis Koroskin

Permalink

Denis Koroskin

Posted in reply to Denis Koroskin

Permalink

On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:16:38 +0300, Denis Koroskin <2korden@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:11:52 +0300, Bill Baxter <wbaxter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Denis Koroskin <2korden@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:53:27 +0300, Walter Bright
>>> <newshound1@digitalmars.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Faster long divides!
>>>>
>>>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
>>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.039.zip
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
>>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.023.zip
>>>
>>> Nice!
>>>
>>> Before you start closing fixed issues, I'd like to ask you add short fix
>>> discription wherever possible, because it is sometimes hard to understand
>>> what is fixed and how, especially in ambiguous cases.
>>>
>>> BTW, D1 is 2 years old by now (DMD1.000 was released on January, 2 in 2007).
>>> Congratulations!
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Whoa!  I would have believed 1 year.  Doesn't seem like 2.
>>
>> --bb
>
> It will be a year for D2 in ten days.
>
>

Ahhhmm.. 2 years as well, sorry for confusion.

Jarrett Billingsley wrote: > The D2 changelog says that he undid the fix to 2500, which might be > the cause. But no word on whether it was the cause, or if D1 got the > revert as well. D1 got the same reversion.

On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Walter Bright <newshound1@digitalmars.com> wrote: > Jarrett Billingsley wrote: >> >> The D2 changelog says that he undid the fix to 2500, which might be the cause. But no word on whether it was the cause, or if D1 got the revert as well. > > D1 got the same reversion. > Wee!

Forums