Thread overview
DCat - a compact web application server in D.
Apr 19, 2009
Steve Teale
Apr 20, 2009
Michel Fortin
Apr 20, 2009
Steve Teale
Apr 20, 2009
Jacob Carlborg
Apr 20, 2009
Steve Teale
Apr 21, 2009
Robert Jacques
Apr 21, 2009
Jacob Carlborg
Apr 20, 2009
Michel Fortin
Apr 20, 2009
Frits van Bommel
April 19, 2009
This is incomplete at this point, but there's a working example. I have to break off now and do some building work. You can find documentation and a zip file (currently it is Windows only, DMD2.026, and Phobos) at http://www.britseyeview.com/dcat/.

It works with Apache2, and uses the AJP13 protocol like Tomcat.

April 20, 2009
On 2009-04-19 15:19:24 -0400, Steve Teale <steve.teale@britseyeview.com> said:

> This is incomplete at this point, but there's a working example. I have to break off now and do some building work. You can find documentation and a zip file (currently it is Windows only, DMD2.026, and Phobos) at http://www.britseyeview.com/dcat/.
> 
> It works with Apache2, and uses the AJP13 protocol like Tomcat.

Interesting. Just as I was thinking of creating a web app in D.

What's the license?

-- 
Michel Fortin
michel.fortin@michelf.com
http://michelf.com/

April 20, 2009
Michel Fortin Wrote:

> On 2009-04-19 15:19:24 -0400, Steve Teale <steve.teale@britseyeview.com> said:
> 
> > This is incomplete at this point, but there's a working example. I have to break off now and do some building work. You can find documentation and a zip file (currently it is Windows only, DMD2.026, and Phobos) at http://www.britseyeview.com/dcat/.
> > 
> > It works with Apache2, and uses the AJP13 protocol like Tomcat.
> 
> Interesting. Just as I was thinking of creating a web app in D.
> 
> What's the license?
> 
> -- 
> Michel Fortin
> michel.fortin@michelf.com
> http://michelf.com/
> 
Hmm, forgot about that stuff, BSD maybe - suggest one please.

April 20, 2009
Steve Teale wrote:
> Michel Fortin Wrote:
> 
>> On 2009-04-19 15:19:24 -0400, Steve Teale <steve.teale@britseyeview.com> said:
>>
>>> This is incomplete at this point, but there's a working example. I have to break off now and do some building work. You can find documentation and a zip file (currently it is Windows only, DMD2.026, and Phobos) at http://www.britseyeview.com/dcat/.
>>>
>>> It works with Apache2, and uses the AJP13 protocol like Tomcat.
>> Interesting. Just as I was thinking of creating a web app in D.
>>
>> What's the license?
>>
>> -- 
>> Michel Fortin
>> michel.fortin@michelf.com
>> http://michelf.com/
>>
> Hmm, forgot about that stuff, BSD maybe - suggest one please.
> 

I suggest Boost or zlib/libpng.
April 20, 2009
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:

> Steve Teale wrote:
> > Michel Fortin Wrote:
> > 
> >> On 2009-04-19 15:19:24 -0400, Steve Teale <steve.teale@britseyeview.com> said:
> >>
> >>> This is incomplete at this point, but there's a working example. I have to break off now and do some building work. You can find documentation and a zip file (currently it is Windows only, DMD2.026, and Phobos) at http://www.britseyeview.com/dcat/.
> >>>
> >>> It works with Apache2, and uses the AJP13 protocol like Tomcat.
> >> Interesting. Just as I was thinking of creating a web app in D.
> >>
> >> What's the license?
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> Michel Fortin
> >> michel.fortin@michelf.com
> >> http://michelf.com/
> >>
> > Hmm, forgot about that stuff, BSD maybe - suggest one please.
> > 
> 
> I suggest Boost or zlib/libpng.

I realize there are legal subtleties in all these licenses. In your view, why is Boost better than BSD? Just curious.

April 20, 2009
On 2009-04-20 00:38:48 -0400, Steve Teale <steve.teale@britseyeview.com> said:

> Michel Fortin Wrote:
> 
>> On 2009-04-19 15:19:24 -0400, Steve Teale <steve.teale@britseyeview.com> said:
>> 
>>> This is incomplete at this point, but there's a working example. I have
>>> to break off now and do some building work. You can find documentation
>>> and a zip file (currently it is Windows only, DMD2.026, and Phobos) at
>>> http://www.britseyeview.com/dcat/.
>>> 
>>> It works with Apache2, and uses the AJP13 protocol like Tomcat.
>> 
>> Interesting. Just as I was thinking of creating a web app in D.
>> 
>> What's the license?
> 
> Hmm, forgot about that stuff, BSD maybe - suggest one please.

By looking at the code, I've found a license. Not sure which license it is (looks a little BSD-like), but at least the terms are clear. Some (not all) modules start with this:

* Copyright (C) 2007 Steve Teale
*
* This software is provided 'as-is', without any express or implied
* warranty.  In no event will the authors be held liable for any damages
* arising from the use of this software.
*
* Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose,
* including commercial applications, and to alter it and redistribute it
* freely, subject to the following restrictions:
*
* 1. The origin of this software must not be misrepresented; you must not
*    claim that you wrote the original software. If you use this software
*    in a product, an acknowledgment in the product documentation would be
*    appreciated but is not required.<p>
* 2. Altered source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must not be
*    misrepresented as being the original software.<p>
* 3. This notice may not be removed or altered from any source distribution.


-- 
Michel Fortin
michel.fortin@michelf.com
http://michelf.com/

April 20, 2009
Michel Fortin wrote:
> On 2009-04-20 00:38:48 -0400, Steve Teale <steve.teale@britseyeview.com> said:
> 
>> Michel Fortin Wrote:
>>
>>> What's the license?
>>
>> Hmm, forgot about that stuff, BSD maybe - suggest one please.
> 
> By looking at the code, I've found a license. Not sure which license it is (looks a little BSD-like), but at least the terms are clear. Some 
[snip]

It's the zlib/libpng license, <http://opensource.org/licenses/zlib-license.php>
April 21, 2009
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 06:34:11 -0400, Steve Teale <steve.teale@britseyeview.com> wrote:

> Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
>
>> Steve Teale wrote:
>> > Michel Fortin Wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 2009-04-19 15:19:24 -0400, Steve Teale  
>> <steve.teale@britseyeview.com> said:
>> >>
>> >>> This is incomplete at this point, but there's a working example. I  
>> have
>> >>> to break off now and do some building work. You can find  
>> documentation
>> >>> and a zip file (currently it is Windows only, DMD2.026, and Phobos)  
>> at
>> >>> http://www.britseyeview.com/dcat/.
>> >>>
>> >>> It works with Apache2, and uses the AJP13 protocol like Tomcat.
>> >> Interesting. Just as I was thinking of creating a web app in D.
>> >>
>> >> What's the license?
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Michel Fortin
>> >> michel.fortin@michelf.com
>> >> http://michelf.com/
>> >>
>> > Hmm, forgot about that stuff, BSD maybe - suggest one please.
>> >
>>
>> I suggest Boost or zlib/libpng.
>
> I realize there are legal subtleties in all these licenses. In your view, why is Boost better than BSD? Just curious.
>

BSD requires all copies (including binary code) to carry a copy of the licence (i.e. in an about box, product documentation, etc). The Boost or zlib/libpng licences don't require binary copies to carry a copy of the licence. D runtime / Phobos use a combination of Boost and zlib/libpng (mainly libpng). Commercial companies can have issues with the requirements of the BSD licence.
April 21, 2009
Steve Teale wrote:
> Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
> 
>> Steve Teale wrote:
>>> Michel Fortin Wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2009-04-19 15:19:24 -0400, Steve Teale <steve.teale@britseyeview.com> said:
>>>>
>>>>> This is incomplete at this point, but there's a working example. I have to break off now and do some building work. You can find documentation and a zip file (currently it is Windows only, DMD2.026, and Phobos) at http://www.britseyeview.com/dcat/.
>>>>>
>>>>> It works with Apache2, and uses the AJP13 protocol like Tomcat.
>>>> Interesting. Just as I was thinking of creating a web app in D.
>>>>
>>>> What's the license?
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Michel Fortin
>>>> michel.fortin@michelf.com
>>>> http://michelf.com/
>>>>
>>> Hmm, forgot about that stuff, BSD maybe - suggest one please.
>>>
>> I suggest Boost or zlib/libpng.
> 
> I realize there are legal subtleties in all these licenses. In your view, why is Boost better than BSD? Just curious.
> 

Because with Boost you don't have to include the license when distributing a copy that is, as the license says, "machine-executable object code generated by a source language processor"