An update just to support Mac OSX 10.6. That also means the end of the line for official support of 10.5 and earlier.

http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.051.zip

Fixed url:

http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.052.zip

"Walter Bright" <newshound1@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:hdim1s$30m8$1@digitalmars.com...
> An update just to support Mac OSX 10.6. That also means the end of the line for official support of 10.5 and earlier.
>
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.051.zip

I propose that the first person to complain about the withdrawn 10.5 support be obligated to wear a "Welcome to Apple" sticker on their forehead for the rest of the day. (Hell, if I'm stuck with this "Beware of smartass" sticker...just...won't...come off...)

Hello Nick,

> "Walter Bright" <newshound1@digitalmars.com> wrote in message
> news:hdim1s$30m8$1@digitalmars.com...
> 
>> An update just to support Mac OSX 10.6. That also means the end of
>> the line for official support of 10.5 and earlier.
>> 
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.051.zip
>> 
> I propose that the first person to complain about the withdrawn 10.5
> support be obligated to wear a "Welcome to Apple" sticker on their
> forehead for the rest of the day. (Hell, if I'm stuck with this
> "Beware of smartass" sticker...just...won't...come off...)
> 

Better yet, they get to maintain a backport!

Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Walter Bright" <newshound1@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:hdim1s$30m8$1@digitalmars.com...
>> An update just to support Mac OSX 10.6. That also means the end of the line for official support of 10.5 and earlier.
>>
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.051.zip
> 
> I propose that the first person to complain about the withdrawn 10.5 support be obligated to wear a "Welcome to Apple" sticker on their forehead for the rest of the day. (Hell, if I'm stuck with this "Beware of smartass" sticker...just...won't...come off...)

There is still dmd 1.051, which isn't going away. dmd 1.052 may even work fine on 10.5, it just won't be supported on 10.5.

BTW, the 10.6 upgrade for the Apple C compiler, etc., seems to have broken support for 10.4.

Walter Bright Wrote:
> 
> BTW, the 10.6 upgrade for the Apple C compiler, etc., seems to have broken support for 10.4.

The 10.4 libraries aren't installed by default, even if you install the developer package.  No idea if that would fix things though.  And Apple doesn't support 10.4 anyway.

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 06:06, Walter Bright <newshound1@digitalmars.com> wrote:
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>
>> "Walter Bright" <newshound1@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:hdim1s$30m8$1@digitalmars.com...
>>>
>>> An update just to support Mac OSX 10.6. That also means the end of the line for official support of 10.5 and earlier.
>>>
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.051.zip
>>
>> I propose that the first person to complain about the withdrawn 10.5 support be obligated to wear a "Welcome to Apple" sticker on their forehead for the rest of the day. (Hell, if I'm stuck with this "Beware of smartass" sticker...just...won't...come off...)
>
> There is still dmd 1.051, which isn't going away. dmd 1.052 may even work fine on 10.5, it just won't be supported on 10.5.
>
> BTW, the 10.6 upgrade for the Apple C compiler, etc., seems to have broken support for 10.4.
>

No, but you'll need to use the 10.4 SDK (it's optional when you install Xcode though). Same problem as last time, between 10.4 and 10.5. But any binaries you compile for 10.4 should work on 10.6 as well.

-- 
Anders Bergh

Sean Kelly wrote:
> Walter Bright Wrote:
>> BTW, the 10.6 upgrade for the Apple C compiler, etc., seems to have
>>  broken support for 10.4.
> 
> The 10.4 libraries aren't installed by default, even if you install
> the developer package.  No idea if that would fix things though.  And
> Apple doesn't support 10.4 anyway.

I installed everything that came on the upgrade DVD.

The OSX makefiles all broke.

Anders Bergh wrote:
> No, but you'll need to use the 10.4 SDK (it's optional when you
> install Xcode though). Same problem as last time, between 10.4 and
> 10.5. But any binaries you compile for 10.4 should work on 10.6 as
> well.

I did have the 10.4 SDK installed, but apparently the upgrade deleted it because the makefiles that referred to it all broke.

Walter Bright wrote:
> An update just to support Mac OSX 10.6.

What is with the spelling of Mac OS X ?
Seems consistent throughout, just wrong.

> That also means the end of the line
> for official support of 10.5 and earlier.

Bye-bye, DMD.

--anders