Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
March 19, 2010 dmd 2.042 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
This is necessary to fix a memory corruption problem with arrays introduced in 2.041. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.042.zip Thanks to the many people who contributed to this update! |
March 19, 2010 Re: dmd 2.042 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:01:59 -0300, Walter Bright <newshound1@digitalmars.com> wrote:
> This is necessary to fix a memory corruption problem with arrays introduced in 2.041.
>
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.042.zip
>
> Thanks to the many people who contributed to this update!
Thanks for another great release. By the way, this seemed to fix a bug I found in D 2.040 last night to do with using Unicode strings as AA keys.
|
March 20, 2010 Re: dmd 2.042 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | Walter Bright wrote:
> This is necessary to fix a memory corruption problem with arrays introduced in 2.041.
>
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.042.zip
>
> Thanks to the many people who contributed to this update!
This is actually a great release, not just an emergency bug fix.
One very minor issue: if you attempt to build phobos on Win32, and you don't have masm386 installed, you need to touch src\druntime\src\rt\minit.obj
This is because the date of minit.asm was changed, even though the file itself was unchanged.
|
March 31, 2010 Re: dmd 2.042 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | On 19/03/2010 19:01, Walter Bright wrote:
> This is necessary to fix a memory corruption problem with arrays
> introduced in 2.041.
>
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.042.zip
>
> Thanks to the many people who contributed to this update!
Especially thanks for the DLL fix(es).
I've just created a very simple test dll in XP/Vista/7 and everything looks fine.
Well I am going to enhance that test a bit in that I am using D TLS variables and WINDOWS hooks.. see how it works.., I am not too pessimistic so far :)
Bjoern
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation