D2 Code:

int main(string[] args) {

	struct S {
		int i;
		this(int i) { this.i = i; }
		void opCall(int x, int y) { }
	}
	
	S s;
	s(4, 1);
	
	return 0;
}

src\main.d(12): Error: constructor main.main.S.this (int i) is not callable using argument types (int,int)
src\main.d(12): Error: expected 1 arguments, not 2 for non-variadic function type ref S(int i)


Am I missing something or is this another major bug?

T.I.A.,
Tom;

Tom:

> Am I missing something or is this another major bug?

A major bug (that is not recognized as major, I think).
I don't remember its number in bugzilla, sorry (anyone remembers it?).

See also: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4053

Bye,
bearophile

El 08/03/2011 05:32, bearophile escribió:
> Tom:
>
>> Am I missing something or is this another major bug?
>
> A major bug (that is not recognized as major, I think).
> I don't remember its number in bugzilla, sorry (anyone remembers it?).
>
> See also:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4053
>
> Bye,
> bearophile

Think I found it:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4253

This is indeed a major bug. Why not tag it as "major"? I think it's a straight loss of functionality and it happens under almost any circumstance in which one wishes to simply use opCall and a struct...

Tom;

On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 10:52:38 -0500, Tom <tom@nospam.com> wrote:

> El 08/03/2011 05:32, bearophile escribió:
>> Tom:
>>
>>> Am I missing something or is this another major bug?
>>
>> A major bug (that is not recognized as major, I think).
>> I don't remember its number in bugzilla, sorry (anyone remembers it?).
>>
>> See also:
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4053
>>
>> Bye,
>> bearophile
>
> Think I found it:
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4253

Those two bugs look almost identical, I think they should be combined...

-Steve

El 08/03/2011 13:05, Steven Schveighoffer escribió:
> On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 10:52:38 -0500, Tom <tom@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>> El 08/03/2011 05:32, bearophile escribió:
>>> Tom:
>>>
>>>> Am I missing something or is this another major bug?
>>>
>>> A major bug (that is not recognized as major, I think).
>>> I don't remember its number in bugzilla, sorry (anyone remembers it?).
>>>
>>> See also:
>>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4053
>>>
>>> Bye,
>>> bearophile
>>
>> Think I found it:
>>
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4253
>
> Those two bugs look almost identical, I think they should be combined...
>
> -Steve

I agree. They should be combined into a major (severity) bug.

Steven Schveighoffe:

> Those two bugs look almost identical, I think they should be combined...

Right, they look similar. I have linked each with the other, so if one gets fixed it's very easy to see if the fix fixes the other too. One bug has 4 votes and one bug 1 vote.

Bye,
bearophile