Thread overview | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
February 01, 2013 xeon phi | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
I'm a newbie to D. I was wondering if D can be compiled to run on the Xeon Phi co-processor. |
February 01, 2013 Re: xeon phi | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Roy Obena | On Friday, 1 February 2013 at 15:18:28 UTC, Roy Obena wrote: > I'm a newbie to D. I was wondering if D can be compiled to run on the Xeon Phi co-processor. Apparently, GCC should have support for Xeon Phi by now: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTEyMjY . This means that GDC (http://gdcproject.org/) should be able to build Xeon Phi friendly executables. I am just guessing here. Do you have Xeon Phi? If so, what is the price? |
February 01, 2013 Re: xeon phi | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Dejan Lekic | On 2013-02-01 16:27, Dejan Lekic wrote: > Apparently, GCC should have support for Xeon Phi by now: > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTEyMjY . This means > that GDC (http://gdcproject.org/) should be able to build Xeon Phi > friendly executables. I am just guessing here. Do you have Xeon Phi? If > so, what is the price? There's also the problem of porting the runtime, if not already done. -- /Jacob Carlborg |
February 02, 2013 Re: xeon phi | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jacob Carlborg | On 02/01/2013 04:55 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> There's also the problem of porting the runtime, if not already done.
Aren't the Xeon Phi chips designed to be x86-compatible? The runtime could surely be optimized for them, but wouldn't necessarily need to be ported per se.
|
February 02, 2013 Re: xeon phi | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Joseph Rushton Wakeling | On 2013-02-02 15:05, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > Aren't the Xeon Phi chips designed to be x86-compatible? The runtime > could surely be optimized for them, but wouldn't necessarily need to be > ported per se. I have no idea what Xeon Phi is. I assumed it was non-x86 since the question was asked and all D compilers support x86. -- /Jacob Carlborg |
February 02, 2013 Re: xeon phi | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jacob Carlborg | Am 02.02.2013 17:51, schrieb Jacob Carlborg: > On 2013-02-02 15:05, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > >> Aren't the Xeon Phi chips designed to be x86-compatible? The runtime >> could surely be optimized for them, but wouldn't necessarily need to be >> ported per se. > > I have no idea what Xeon Phi is. I assumed it was non-x86 since the > question was asked and all D compilers support x86. > The processor formerly known as Larabee. http://www.intel.de/content/www/us/en/high-performance-computing/high-performance-xeon-phi-coprocessor-brief.html http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/xeon-phi-larrabee-stampede-hpc,3342.html |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation