Jump to page: 1 2
Thread overview
DConf 2013 Day 3 Talk 4: LDC by David Nadlinger
Jun 17, 2013
bearophile
Jun 17, 2013
nazriel
Jun 17, 2013
Justin Whear
Jun 17, 2013
jerro
Jun 19, 2013
Kai Nacke
Jun 17, 2013
Andrej Mitrovic
Jun 17, 2013
Walter Bright
Jun 18, 2013
Marco Leise
Jun 18, 2013
David Nadlinger
Jun 17, 2013
Nick Sabalausky
Jun 19, 2013
Jacob Carlborg
Jun 19, 2013
Jacob Carlborg
June 17, 2013
You know the drill!

reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1gie4b/dconf_2013_ldc_the_llvmbased_d_compiler_by_david/

hackernews: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5892652

facebook: https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/658638807483137

twitter: https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/346598441230671873

youtube: http://youtube.com/watch?v=ntdKZWSiJdY


Andrei
June 17, 2013
Great talk!

Regarding the ci.lycus.org fleet, credit should definitely go to Adam Wilson (C# to D talk) and Kelly Wilson (same person who was present in the pie chart) too for providing many of the machines hooked up to the master node.

The fleet doesn't do a whole lot of work most of the time, so if you have a project that

1) has a sane build system;
2) you're willing to respond to build failures on;
3) and is 'significant' enough,

feel free to email me and I'll see what I can do.

(By 'significant' I mean "has enough impact to be useful for a reasonable amount of D programmers". This is of course pretty subjective, but we have to be a bit conservative about how many projects we add so that we don't end up having lots of stalled builds in the queue.)
June 17, 2013
Andrei Alexandrescu:

> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1gie4b/dconf_2013_ldc_the_llvmbased_d_compiler_by_david/

Slide 14:

PFFT (SSE) seems slow on LDC2: if you can extract a small test
case LLVM devs will appreciate a lot a bug report (they fixed
many lacks of optimizations submitted by me). If you have a link
to the PFFT code them maybe I can do that myself.


Slide 25:
> Implicit invariants often hard to track down

Then maybe it's a good idea to add such invariants to the dmd
front-end code, even before its port to D.

Bye,
bearophile
June 17, 2013
On 6/17/13, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail@erdani.org> wrote:
> youtube: http://youtube.com/watch?v=ntdKZWSiJdY

There seems to be some audio glitching every couple of seconds (at the beginning). I've noticed this in other videos as well. It's mostly minimal though, not much harm done.
June 17, 2013
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:19:14 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 6/17/13, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail@erdani.org> wrote:
>> youtube: http://youtube.com/watch?v=ntdKZWSiJdY
>
> There seems to be some audio glitching every couple of seconds (at the
> beginning). I've noticed this in other videos as well. It's mostly
> minimal though, not much harm done.

I noticed that during the conference.  There were several talks where the mic was giving the AV guys trouble.  Each of the speakers was using a clip-on remote mic.  Of course, live, it wasn't as big a deal, as we could hear the person talking :)  But it would be more glaring for the recording.

I'm sure if there are any glitches that omit an important piece of the talk, point them out and the speaker and/or conference attendees can help discern what was being said.

-Steve
June 17, 2013
On Monday, 17 June 2013 at 13:47:20 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu:
>
>> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1gie4b/dconf_2013_ldc_the_llvmbased_d_compiler_by_david/
>
> Slide 14:
>
> PFFT (SSE) seems slow on LDC2: if you can extract a small test
> case LLVM devs will appreciate a lot a bug report (they fixed
> many lacks of optimizations submitted by me). If you have a link
> to the PFFT code them maybe I can do that myself.
>
I don't know what PFFT stands for (can't google it either, funny results shows up) but if it related to vectorization then maybe LDC has been slower because it was built against LLVM 3.3 while LLVM 3.4 brings more vector optimizations.

Maybe all what has to be done, is rerunning benchmarks against LDC + LLVM 3.4 ?
>
> Slide 25:
>> Implicit invariants often hard to track down
>
> Then maybe it's a good idea to add such invariants to the dmd
> front-end code, even before its port to D.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile

June 17, 2013
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:41:22 +0200, nazriel wrote:

> On Monday, 17 June 2013 at 13:47:20 UTC, bearophile wrote:
>> Andrei Alexandrescu:
>>
>>> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1gie4b/
dconf_2013_ldc_the_llvmbased_d_compiler_by_david/
>>
>> Slide 14:
>>
>> PFFT (SSE) seems slow on LDC2: if you can extract a small test case LLVM devs will appreciate a lot a bug report (they fixed many lacks of optimizations submitted by me). If you have a link to the PFFT code them maybe I can do that myself.
>>
> I don't know what PFFT stands for (can't google it either, funny results shows up) but if it related to vectorization then maybe LDC has been slower because it was built against LLVM 3.3 while LLVM 3.4 brings more vector optimizations.
> 
> Maybe all what has to be done, is rerunning benchmarks against LDC + LLVM 3.4 ?
>>
>> Slide 25:
>>> Implicit invariants often hard to track down
>>
>> Then maybe it's a good idea to add such invariants to the dmd front-end code, even before its port to D.
>>
>> Bye,
>> bearophile

My guess is Parallel Fast Fourier Transform.
June 17, 2013
On 6/17/13 8:25 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> You know the drill!
>
> reddit:
> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1gie4b/dconf_2013_ldc_the_llvmbased_d_compiler_by_david/
>
>
> hackernews: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5892652
>
> facebook: https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/658638807483137
>
> twitter: https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/346598441230671873
>
> youtube: http://youtube.com/watch?v=ntdKZWSiJdY
>
>
> Andrei

HD video up: https://archive.org/details/dconf2013-day03-talk04

Andrei
June 17, 2013
On 6/17/2013 8:35 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> I'm sure if there are any glitches that omit an important piece of the talk,
> point them out and the speaker and/or conference attendees can help discern what
> was being said.

I was saying "flip that!".

June 17, 2013
On Monday, 17 June 2013 at 15:56:21 UTC, Justin Whear wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:41:22 +0200, nazriel wrote:
>
>> On Monday, 17 June 2013 at 13:47:20 UTC, bearophile wrote:
>>> Andrei Alexandrescu:
>>>
>>>> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1gie4b/
> dconf_2013_ldc_the_llvmbased_d_compiler_by_david/
>>>
>>> Slide 14:
>>>
>>> PFFT (SSE) seems slow on LDC2: if you can extract a small test case
>>> LLVM devs will appreciate a lot a bug report (they fixed many lacks of
>>> optimizations submitted by me). If you have a link to the PFFT code
>>> them maybe I can do that myself.
>>>
>> I don't know what PFFT stands for (can't google it either, funny results
>> shows up) but if it related to vectorization then maybe LDC has been
>> slower because it was built against LLVM 3.3 while LLVM 3.4 brings more
>> vector optimizations.
>> 
>> Maybe all what has to be done, is rerunning benchmarks against LDC +
>> LLVM 3.4 ?
>>>
>>> Slide 25:
>>>> Implicit invariants often hard to track down
>>>
>>> Then maybe it's a good idea to add such invariants to the dmd front-end
>>> code, even before its port to D.
>>>
>>> Bye,
>>> bearophile
>
> My guess is Parallel Fast Fourier Transform.

It's Pretty Fast Fourier Transform. The code is at

https://github.com/jerro/pfft/tree/experimental

(I linked to the experimental branch because master branch is quite outdated)
« First   ‹ Prev
1 2