Jump to page: 1 24  
Page
Thread overview
dmd 2.065 - Agenda
Nov 08, 2013
Martin Nowak
Nov 08, 2013
Dmitry Olshansky
Nov 08, 2013
monarch_dodra
Nov 08, 2013
Dmitry Olshansky
Nov 08, 2013
Walter Bright
Nov 08, 2013
Jacob Carlborg
Nov 08, 2013
bearophile
Nov 08, 2013
Brad Roberts
Nov 09, 2013
Walter Bright
Nov 09, 2013
Martin Nowak
Nov 09, 2013
Jacob Carlborg
Nov 09, 2013
Timothee Cour
Nov 08, 2013
deadalnix
Nov 09, 2013
Walter Bright
Nov 14, 2013
Dejan Lekic
Nov 14, 2013
qznc
Nov 14, 2013
Dejan Lekic
Nov 14, 2013
Brad Roberts
Nov 09, 2013
Rob T
Nov 09, 2013
Timothee Cour
Nov 09, 2013
Martin Nowak
Nov 09, 2013
Jacob Carlborg
Nov 09, 2013
Timothee Cour
Nov 10, 2013
Jacob Carlborg
Nov 09, 2013
ilya-stromberg
Nov 09, 2013
Kenji Hara
Nov 09, 2013
Kelet
Nov 09, 2013
Timothee Cour
Nov 09, 2013
Brad Roberts
Nov 09, 2013
Martin Nowak
Nov 13, 2013
bearophile
Nov 12, 2013
Walter Bright
Nov 14, 2013
Manu
Nov 14, 2013
Walter Bright
Nov 14, 2013
Manu
November 08, 2013
I made a wiki page for that.
Please discuss, improve and prioritize.
http://wiki.dlang.org/Agenda
November 08, 2013
09-Nov-2013 00:09, Martin Nowak пишет:
> I made a wiki page for that.
> Please discuss, improve and prioritize.
> http://wiki.dlang.org/Agenda

Added few goals for Phobos (hopefully describing a general consensus).

1. Fight the dependency hell & split up huge modules.

As seen during private exchanges during beta period this has been under the radar for far too long. Can also be read as "shrink the size of  a hello-world app".

2. Get @safe write(f)(ln) at least for basic types.

There has been some great improvement on getting more @safe-ty in Phobos. Correct me I'm wrong but but we seem to be very close to achieving this symbolic goal and then it's well worth prioritizing.

More to come I hope.

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky
November 08, 2013
> More safety - @safe writeln ?

I think this is good, but also the kind of thing we don't want to
rush. Making things useable in safe code usually means marking
things trusted. Do this too fast, and you end up trusting code
that is actually totally unsafe :/ It's a delicate process.
November 08, 2013
09-Nov-2013 00:50, monarch_dodra пишет:
>> More safety - @safe writeln ?
>
> I think this is good, but also the kind of thing we don't want to
> rush. Making things useable in safe code usually means marking
> things trusted. Do this too fast, and you end up trusting code
> that is actually totally unsafe :/ It's a delicate process.

Well if it's indeed Mar 2014 I think there is no rush :)

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky
November 08, 2013
On 11/8/2013 12:53 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> Well if it's indeed Mar 2014 I think there is no rush :)

Except that the more disruptive a change is, the earlier in the cycle it should be done, so it can bake properly.

November 08, 2013
On 2013-11-08 21:09, Martin Nowak wrote:
> I made a wiki page for that.
> Please discuss, improve and prioritize.
> http://wiki.dlang.org/Agenda

I think one of the most important issue for this release is the actual process. Basically what you wrote for "Other".

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg
November 08, 2013
Martin Nowak:

> I made a wiki page for that.
> Please discuss, improve and prioritize.
> http://wiki.dlang.org/Agenda

"scope"?

Bye,
bearophile
November 08, 2013
On 11/8/13 12:09 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
> I made a wiki page for that.
> Please discuss, improve and prioritize.
> http://wiki.dlang.org/Agenda

I strongly urge the release timing to be a max of 2 months from now, not 5.  I'd prefer getting back to monthly if we can, but that's probably overly optimistic based on the way we've been doing things.
November 08, 2013
On Friday, 8 November 2013 at 20:09:57 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> I made a wiki page for that.
> Please discuss, improve and prioritize.
> http://wiki.dlang.org/Agenda

Getting a build master :D
November 09, 2013
On 11/8/2013 3:01 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:
> I strongly urge the release timing to be a max of 2 months from now, not 5.  I'd
> prefer getting back to monthly if we can, but that's probably overly optimistic
> based on the way we've been doing things.

It can be done if we get an automated release process (hint, hint!).
« First   ‹ Prev
1 2 3 4