| |
| Posted by ag0aep6g in reply to Ali Çehreli | PermalinkReply |
|
ag0aep6g
Posted in reply to Ali Çehreli
| On 15.05.23 08:24, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 5/14/23 22:49, ag0aep6g wrote:
>
> > Why is it impossible for you to explain IVY in a forum post?
>
> Do you remember how many sessions it took for Mike and others to understand how IVY could help?
It might have taken them long to understand how IVY helps, but Mike also said that it's "simple". So the basics should fit into a forum post, no? Just give us the core idea, or an outline of the program, something. If we don't see immediately how it helps, there can be follow up.
> > Why does it
> > need one-to-one chats to do that?
>
> I don't know. Some human things are just like that.
Nonsense. You might not be able to teach me to dance over e-mail, but you can give me an idea of what dancing is.
Suppose we are in a one-on-one chat about IVY, what would be the first thing you say to me? By refusing to elaborate in a meaningful way you guys are just making it seem super weird. As I said, you're not making me excited for it, you're making me suspicious of it.
> > I'm told my friends
> > can't come with,
>
> There is something wrong here.
>
> > Am I being
> > recruited into a cult?
>
> That exact joke was made... by me! :)
So you see where I'm coming from. Except you then got an answer that satisfied you, I presume. I didn't.
> > I would love to read about IVY. Here. I am not interested in personal
> > chats with you.
>
> Somehow that sounds hurtful.
Yeah, I'm not exactly trying to hide my resentment towards you guys. I don't have anything against you in particular, Ali, but since you've come to interject here you might feel some of my negative emotions coming in your general direction.
[...]
> > motivate me to push D to
> > excellence?
>
> Erm? Isn't this all about exactly that? And you want it as you insist on trying to kill excitement?
I get that Mike is trying to spark excitement. I don't think the IVY posts are doing a good job at that. I'm telling you it has the opposite effect on me.
Mike: "Be excited about IVY!"
Others: "Yay! IVY! Woo!"
Other others: "What is IVY? Kinda sounds like hot air."
Mike: "It's not hot air. It's great!"
Me: "You didn't answer the question there. Still sounds like hot air to me."
You: "Don't be such a buzzkill."
Maybe I'm just a grinch trying to steal your IVY Christmas. But I don't believe that being excitable about nothing is a desirable trait for a programmer. You should not be selecting for that.
> > For this contributor here, IVY has achieved one thing so far: It put
> > another brick in the wall between D's leadership and me.
>
> I don't think it was IVY that did that.
Oh, but it did. The wall already had a good number of bricks, of course. But the IVY hype attempt and the poor reaction to negative feedback is adding one more.
> > Meanwhile, the bug I mentioned in that post is still open.
> >
> > If you want to use Agile, or Waterfall, or IVY, or whatever, go ahead.
> > But it better help get bugs fixed. Otherwise, it's a waste of time.
>
> Time can be wasted in multitude of ways.
I guess that's supposed to mean that I'm wasting time. And I guess that's true in a way. I should probably just walk away from D. But calling out Mike's non-answers felt right and still does. I regret nothing! :P
|