| Thread overview | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
September 17 Survey: Memory safety in D, what is your view? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 | Hello! In my interest towards memory safety, and with a variety of views on the topic in the community, I think now is a good time to do a survey to find out where everyone is placed. So if you are interested in escape analysis, temporal, or just plain old type state analysis for nullability please fill it out! | |||
September 25 Re: Survey: Memory safety in D, what is your view? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 Posted in reply to Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole | On Tuesday, 17 September 2024 at 08:05:47 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole wrote: >Hello! In my interest towards memory safety, and with a variety of views on the topic in the community, I think now is a good time to do a survey to find out where everyone is placed. So if you are interested in escape analysis, temporal, or just plain old type state analysis for nullability please fill it out! Any chance of seeing the results? The site did show me the results up to that point when I answered, but there doesn't seem to be a way to re-ead them without reposting another answer. | |||
September 26 Re: Survey: Memory safety in D, what is your view? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Dukc | On 26/09/2024 5:04 AM, Dukc wrote:
> On Tuesday, 17 September 2024 at 08:05:47 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> In my interest towards memory safety, and with a variety of views on the topic in the community, I think now is a good time to do a survey to find out where everyone is placed.
>>
>> So if you are interested in escape analysis, temporal, or just plain old type state analysis for nullability please fill it out!
>>
>> [link](https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdynYsQoq_TAkLZH952S3J4sPBrcFwUabSLKq-w2PT-nd4iuw/viewform)
>
> Any chance of seeing the results? The site did show me the results up to that point when I answered, but there doesn't seem to be a way to re-ead them without reposting another answer.
I'm not aware of how to do that, especially since I disabled the storing of emails.
It is currently up to 43 responses, and over all not much has changed for a good 20 responses.
I'll do a report here once I've presented it at a DLF monthly meeting. But that might not be until November.
| |||
September 25 Re: Survey: Memory safety in D, what is your view? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 Posted in reply to Dukc | On Wednesday, 25 September 2024 at 17:04:42 UTC, Dukc wrote: >On Tuesday, 17 September 2024 at 08:05:47 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole wrote: >Hello! In my interest towards memory safety, and with a variety of views on the topic in the community, I think now is a good time to do a survey to find out where everyone is placed. So if you are interested in escape analysis, temporal, or just plain old type state analysis for nullability please fill it out! Any chance of seeing the results? The site did show me the results up to that point when I answered, but there doesn't seem to be a way to re-ead them without reposting another answer. Replace viewform with viewanalytics in the url. Juraj | |||
September 25 Re: Survey: Memory safety in D, what is your view? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Juraj | On Wednesday, 25 September 2024 at 17:31:56 UTC, Juraj wrote: >Replace viewform with viewanalytics in the url. Juraj Thanks! | |||
1 day ago Re: Survey: Memory safety in D, what is your view? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole | Reminder this is closing in a few days. If you haven't already please fill it out, even if you are not interested in memory safety that is useful information for us to have! | |||
20 hours ago Re: Survey: Memory safety in D, what is your view? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 Posted in reply to Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole | > Given the opt-in nature of the memory safety features, do you feel like the D community and therefore the language are going in the right direction? It's not obvious where the language is going and you didn't assert what you assume. | |||
19 hours ago Re: Survey: Memory safety in D, what is your view? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole | Apparently you also assume -preview=nosharedaccess and -preview=in are | |||
10 hours ago Re: Survey: Memory safety in D, what is your view? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 Posted in reply to Kagamin | On Wednesday, 6 November 2024 at 07:29:27 UTC, Kagamin wrote: > >Given the opt-in nature of the memory safety features, do you feel like the D community and therefore the language are going in the right direction? It's not obvious where the language is going and you didn't assert what you assume. It may not be obvious if the language is stalled or actively getting worse; but I think its fair to say that on a hyperbolic plane, they are not making progress. | |||
10 hours ago Re: Survey: Memory safety in D, what is your view? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 Posted in reply to Dukc | On Wednesday, 25 September 2024 at 17:04:42 UTC, Dukc wrote: >On Tuesday, 17 September 2024 at 08:05:47 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole wrote: >Hello! In my interest towards memory safety, and with a variety of views on the topic in the community, I think now is a good time to do a survey to find out where everyone is placed. So if you are interested in escape analysis, temporal, or just plain old type state analysis for nullability please fill it out! Any chance of seeing the results? The site did show me the results up to that point when I answered, but there doesn't seem to be a way to re-ead them without reposting another answer. So far, 60 people, including me, have filled out the survey and you are among the respondents, you can track the results with the Here is the link: SDB@79 | |||
Permalink
Reply
