Hello

According to the spec[0], D supports zero length arrays [1].

I have given this a shot at https://run.dlang.io/is/PwbPxJ

Attempting to use the zero-length array results in a compiler error

`a.contents[2]` -> Error: array index 2 is out of bounds (*a).contents[0 .. 0]

The way I've used around this error is "safely" break/trick the type system

```
    int *p = a.contents.ptr;
    int[] p_cont = p[0 .. n];
    p_cont[2] = 10; // fine
```

Is this the intended way of working with zero length arrays?

Cheers,
Edi


[0] - https://dlang.org/spec/arrays.html#static-arrays, best practices pt 2
[1] - https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.4/gcc/Zero-Length.html

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 01:34:37PM +0000, Eduard Staniloiu via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Hello
> 
> According to the spec[0], D supports zero length arrays [1].

Huh. I didn't even know D was supposed to support this.  I found a few examples of this usage in Adam Ruppe's arsd code, where the zero-length array is sliced as you indicated:

	struct X {
		int[0] data;
	}
	X* x = ...;

	int[] arr = x.data.ptr[0 .. n];
	arr[i] = ...;


[...]
> Attempting to use the zero-length array results in a compiler error
> 
> `a.contents[2]` -> Error: array index 2 is out of bounds
> (*a).contents[0 ..  0]

Yeah this needs to be explicated in the docs / spec.


> The way I've used around this error is "safely" break/trick the type system
> 
> ```
>     int *p = a.contents.ptr;
>     int[] p_cont = p[0 .. n];
>     p_cont[2] = 10; // fine
> ```
> 
> Is this the intended way of working with zero length arrays?
[...]

No idea.  But it's probably the only way of actually using them right now. :-D  The spec / docs need to be updated.


T

-- 
Long, long ago, the ancient Chinese invented a device that lets them see through walls. It was called the "window".