Can I rely on this format from fullyQualifiedName? for example, let's say I do:

enum s = fullyQualifiedName!f.split;

where f is a function member of a class. Can I realy that s[0] is the module name, s[1] is the class name and s[2] the functio name? is this standard or can the compile change that? I've tested on dmd, does ldc or gdc do something different?

class A
{
  void f() { }

   void baa()
   {
      enum s = fullyQualifiedName!f.split;
   }
}

On Saturday, 24 April 2021 at 03:40:20 UTC, Jack wrote:

enum s = fullyQualifiedName!f.split;

You can rely on the order, but you cannot expect any of the names to be at a specific index. The FQN includes the symbol's entire hierarchy. So you could have one or more package names in front of the module name. Essentially:

{all.package.names.}moduleName.{struct/class/functionName}.symbolName

On Saturday, 24 April 2021 at 04:09:15 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:

enum s = fullyQualifiedName!f.split;

thank you Mike, having sure I can rely on the other is enough to me