Thread overview | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 10, 2017 The New CTFE Engine on the Blog | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Stefan has been diligently keeping us all updated on NewCTFE here in the forums. Now, he's gone to the blog to say something to tell the world about it. The blog: https://dlang.org/blog/2017/04/10/the-new-ctfe-engine/ Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/64jfes/an_introduction_to_ds_new_engine_for_compiletime/ |
April 11, 2017 Re: The New CTFE Engine on the Blog | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Mike Parker | On 04/10/2017 06:07 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
> Stefan has been diligently keeping us all updated on NewCTFE here in the
> forums. Now, he's gone to the blog to say something to tell the world
> about it.
>
> The blog:
> https://dlang.org/blog/2017/04/10/the-new-ctfe-engine/
>
> Reddit:
> https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/64jfes/an_introduction_to_ds_new_engine_for_compiletime/
>
The first code sample is
private immutable ubyte[128] uri_flags = // indexed by character
({
// ...
})();
and the text says "The ({ starts a function-literal, the }) closes it.". Why the extra parentheses? Just the curly brackets works, no?
private immutable ubyte[128] uri_flags = // indexed by character
{
// ...
}();
Ali
|
April 12, 2017 Re: The New CTFE Engine on the Blog | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Ali Çehreli | On Wednesday, 12 April 2017 at 05:51:20 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 04/10/2017 06:07 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
>> Stefan has been diligently keeping us all updated on NewCTFE here in the
>> forums. Now, he's gone to the blog to say something to tell the world
>> about it.
>>
>> The blog:
>> https://dlang.org/blog/2017/04/10/the-new-ctfe-engine/
>>
>> Reddit:
>> https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/64jfes/an_introduction_to_ds_new_engine_for_compiletime/
>>
>
> The first code sample is
>
> private immutable ubyte[128] uri_flags = // indexed by character
> ({
> // ...
> })();
>
> and the text says "The ({ starts a function-literal, the }) closes it.". Why the extra parentheses? Just the curly brackets works, no?
>
> private immutable ubyte[128] uri_flags = // indexed by character
> {
> // ...
> }();
>
> Ali
Yes it would work.
But I like to distinguish function-literals from blocks :)
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation