Andrei is back online and thus it is time to make a decision about adding his allocator package (http://forum.dlang.org/post/vfipmwojmvseqxoiwndr@forum.dlang.org) to Phobos std.experimental

Docs: http://erdani.com/d/phobos-prerelease/std_experimental_allocator.html
Code: https://github.com/andralex/phobos/tree/allocator/std/experimental/allocator

Please respond to this post with a comment starting with a single "Yes"/"No" and optional explanation after that. Criteria you are expected to evaluate as part of "Yes":

- is this functionality needed in Phobos
- is basic design sound (some breaking changes are OK for std.experimental but not full redesign)

As usual, anyone can vote, but opinions of Phobos developers hold more value.

Voting ends in 2 weeks, on July 22.

On 8/07/2015 11:33 p.m., Dicebot wrote:
> Andrei is back online and thus it is time to make a decision about
> adding his allocator package
> (http://forum.dlang.org/post/vfipmwojmvseqxoiwndr@forum.dlang.org) to
> Phobos std.experimental
>
> Docs: http://erdani.com/d/phobos-prerelease/std_experimental_allocator.html
> Code:
> https://github.com/andralex/phobos/tree/allocator/std/experimental/allocator
>
>
> Please respond to this post with a comment starting with a single
> "Yes"/"No" and optional explanation after that. Criteria you are
> expected to evaluate as part of "Yes":
>
> - is this functionality needed in Phobos
> - is basic design sound (some breaking changes are OK for
> std.experimental but not full redesign)
>
> As usual, anyone can vote, but opinions of Phobos developers hold more
> value.
>
> Voting ends in 2 weeks, on July 22.

Yes.

I do have opinions about it, i.e. it doesn't feel 100% right especially from work with std.experimental.image.
However it is needed and I do not believe that it has any major issues. It's just smallish things that I cannot quite put my finger on.

Yes

On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 11:33:03 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> Andrei is back online and thus it is time to make a decision about adding his allocator package (http://forum.dlang.org/post/vfipmwojmvseqxoiwndr@forum.dlang.org) to Phobos std.experimental
>
> [...]

Yes.

I think getting it into std.experimental is important to get more people to test it for sound design.

On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 11:33:03 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>
> Please respond to this post with a comment starting with a single "Yes"/"No" and optional explanation after that. Criteria you are expected to evaluate as part of "Yes":
>

Yes.

On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 11:33:03 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> Please respond to this post with a comment starting with a single "Yes"/"No"

Yes

Yes


-- 
Dmitry Olshansky

yeah

On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 11:33:03 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> Andrei is back online and thus it is time to make a decision about adding his allocator package (http://forum.dlang.org/post/vfipmwojmvseqxoiwndr@forum.dlang.org) to Phobos std.experimental
>
> [...]

Yes

Yes.