Thread overview
vibed.org is down
Sep 02, 2016
finalpatch
Sep 02, 2016
Mike Parker
Sep 02, 2016
wobbles
Sep 02, 2016
Daniel Kozak
Sep 02, 2016
Sönke Ludwig
Sep 02, 2016
Daniel Kozak
Sep 02, 2016
Nemanja Boric
Sep 02, 2016
Nemanja Boric
Sep 02, 2016
Daniel Kozak
Sep 02, 2016
Daniel Kozak
September 02, 2016
"500 - Internal Server Error

Internal Server Error"

Probably not good for publicity.
September 02, 2016
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:02:20 UTC, finalpatch wrote:

>
> Probably not good for publicity.

meh. It's the internet. Sometimes servers go down.
September 02, 2016
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:23:51 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:02:20 UTC, finalpatch wrote:
>
>>
>> Probably not good for publicity.
>
> meh. It's the internet. Sometimes servers go down.

code.dlang.org is down too :-(
September 02, 2016
Dne 2.9.2016 v 09:39 wobbles via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):

> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:23:51 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:02:20 UTC, finalpatch wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Probably not good for publicity.
>>
>> meh. It's the internet. Sometimes servers go down.
>
> code.dlang.org is down too :-(
Maybe we should have multiple hostings? For example one in US and one in Europe ;).
September 02, 2016
Am 02.09.2016 um 09:48 schrieb Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d:
> Dne 2.9.2016 v 09:39 wobbles via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
>
>> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:23:51 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>>> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:02:20 UTC, finalpatch wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Probably not good for publicity.
>>>
>>> meh. It's the internet. Sometimes servers go down.
>>
>> code.dlang.org is down too :-(
> Maybe we should have multiple hostings? For example one in US and one in
> Europe ;).

At least for code.dlang.org it would be nice to have a backup server - ideally somewhere with a good connection to China. We need to implement a mirror mode for that.
September 02, 2016
Dne 2.9.2016 v 12:20 Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):

> Am 02.09.2016 um 09:48 schrieb Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d:
>> Dne 2.9.2016 v 09:39 wobbles via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
>>
>>> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:23:51 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>>>> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:02:20 UTC, finalpatch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Probably not good for publicity.
>>>>
>>>> meh. It's the internet. Sometimes servers go down.
>>>
>>> code.dlang.org is down too :-(
>> Maybe we should have multiple hostings? For example one in US and one in
>> Europe ;).
>
> At least for code.dlang.org it would be nice to have a backup server - ideally somewhere with a good connection to China. We need to implement a mirror mode for that.

Our company has VPS in China and I have VPS in Czech republic, and it seems there is a good connection to it from china:

#ping from our china server to mine VPS
web@WebCN:~ $ ping ipult.cz
PING ipult.cz.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.031 ms
64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.035 ms
64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.028 ms
64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.028 ms
64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.030 ms

#ping from our china server to code.dlang.org
web@WebCN:~ $ ping code.dlang.org
PING code.dlang.org (79.140.41.234) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=302 ms
64 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=303 ms
64 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=302 ms
64 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=302 ms
64 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=302 ms


September 02, 2016
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 10:32:07 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> web@WebCN:~ $ ping ipult.cz
> PING ipult.cz.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.031 ms
> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.035 ms
> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.028 ms
> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.028 ms
> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.030 ms
>

Given that there are 6-7000km from China to Czech Republic, your internet connection seems to be way faster than speed of light :-).

September 02, 2016
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 11:24:53 UTC, Nemanja Boric wrote:
> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 10:32:07 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>> web@WebCN:~ $ ping ipult.cz
>> PING ipult.cz.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119) 56(84) bytes of data.
>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.031 ms
>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.035 ms
>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.028 ms
>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.028 ms
>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.030 ms
>>
>
> Given that there are 6-7000km from China to Czech Republic, your internet connection seems to be way faster than speed of light :-).

Ah, this is actually pinging some host in China, not the CZ. Sorry!
September 02, 2016
Wow :D, you are right


Dne 2.9.2016 v 13:24 Nemanja Boric via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 10:32:07 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>> web@WebCN:~ $ ping ipult.cz
>> PING ipult.cz.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119) 56(84) bytes of data.
>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.031 ms
>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.035 ms
>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.028 ms
>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.028 ms
>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.030 ms
>>
>
> Given that there are 6-7000km from China to Czech Republic, your internet connection seems to be way faster than speed of light :-).
>

September 02, 2016
Dne 2.9.2016 v 13:26 Nemanja Boric via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):

> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 11:24:53 UTC, Nemanja Boric wrote:
>> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 10:32:07 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>>> web@WebCN:~ $ ping ipult.cz
>>> PING ipult.cz.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119) 56(84) bytes of data.
>>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.031 ms
>>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.035 ms
>>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.028 ms
>>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.028 ms
>>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.030 ms
>>>
>>
>> Given that there are 6-7000km from China to Czech Republic, your internet connection seems to be way faster than speed of light :-).
>
> Ah, this is actually pinging some host in China, not the CZ. Sorry!
This is better :)

web@WebCN:~ $ ping -s 65000 code.dlang.org
PING code.dlang.org (79.140.41.234) 65000(65028) bytes of data.
65008 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=314 ms
65008 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=314 ms
65008 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=314 ms
65008 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=314 ms
65008 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=314 ms
65008 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=314 ms


--- code.dlang.org ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 6 received, 14% packet loss, time 6513ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 314.219/314.405/314.653/0.736 ms
web@WebCN:~ $ ping -s 65000 mail.ipult.cz
PING mail.ipult.cz (37.205.11.135) 65000(65028) bytes of data.
65008 bytes from mail.ipult.cz (37.205.11.135): icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=243 ms
65008 bytes from mail.ipult.cz (37.205.11.135): icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=243 ms
65008 bytes from mail.ipult.cz (37.205.11.135): icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=243 ms
65008 bytes from mail.ipult.cz (37.205.11.135): icmp_seq=4 ttl=47 time=243 ms
65008 bytes from mail.ipult.cz (37.205.11.135): icmp_seq=5 ttl=47 time=243 ms
65008 bytes from mail.ipult.cz (37.205.11.135): icmp_seq=6 ttl=47 time=243 ms
65008 bytes from mail.ipult.cz (37.205.11.135): icmp_seq=7 ttl=47 time=243 ms
^C
--- mail.ipult.cz ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 7 received, 0% packet loss, time 6694ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 243.269/243.377/243.423/0.591 ms