Thread overview | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
September 02, 2016 vibed.org is down | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
"500 - Internal Server Error Internal Server Error" Probably not good for publicity. |
September 02, 2016 Re: vibed.org is down | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to finalpatch | On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:02:20 UTC, finalpatch wrote:
>
> Probably not good for publicity.
meh. It's the internet. Sometimes servers go down.
|
September 02, 2016 Re: vibed.org is down | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Mike Parker | On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:23:51 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:02:20 UTC, finalpatch wrote:
>
>>
>> Probably not good for publicity.
>
> meh. It's the internet. Sometimes servers go down.
code.dlang.org is down too :-(
|
September 02, 2016 Re: vibed.org is down | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to wobbles | Dne 2.9.2016 v 09:39 wobbles via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:23:51 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:02:20 UTC, finalpatch wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Probably not good for publicity.
>>
>> meh. It's the internet. Sometimes servers go down.
>
> code.dlang.org is down too :-(
Maybe we should have multiple hostings? For example one in US and one in Europe ;).
|
September 02, 2016 Re: vibed.org is down | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Daniel Kozak | Am 02.09.2016 um 09:48 schrieb Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d:
> Dne 2.9.2016 v 09:39 wobbles via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
>
>> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:23:51 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>>> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:02:20 UTC, finalpatch wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Probably not good for publicity.
>>>
>>> meh. It's the internet. Sometimes servers go down.
>>
>> code.dlang.org is down too :-(
> Maybe we should have multiple hostings? For example one in US and one in
> Europe ;).
At least for code.dlang.org it would be nice to have a backup server - ideally somewhere with a good connection to China. We need to implement a mirror mode for that.
|
September 02, 2016 Re: vibed.org is down | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Sönke Ludwig | Dne 2.9.2016 v 12:20 Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d napsal(a): > Am 02.09.2016 um 09:48 schrieb Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d: >> Dne 2.9.2016 v 09:39 wobbles via Digitalmars-d napsal(a): >> >>> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:23:51 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: >>>> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:02:20 UTC, finalpatch wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Probably not good for publicity. >>>> >>>> meh. It's the internet. Sometimes servers go down. >>> >>> code.dlang.org is down too :-( >> Maybe we should have multiple hostings? For example one in US and one in >> Europe ;). > > At least for code.dlang.org it would be nice to have a backup server - ideally somewhere with a good connection to China. We need to implement a mirror mode for that. Our company has VPS in China and I have VPS in Czech republic, and it seems there is a good connection to it from china: #ping from our china server to mine VPS web@WebCN:~ $ ping ipult.cz PING ipult.cz.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.031 ms 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.035 ms 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.028 ms 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.028 ms 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.030 ms #ping from our china server to code.dlang.org web@WebCN:~ $ ping code.dlang.org PING code.dlang.org (79.140.41.234) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=302 ms 64 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=303 ms 64 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=302 ms 64 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=302 ms 64 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=302 ms |
September 02, 2016 Re: vibed.org is down | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Daniel Kozak | On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 10:32:07 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> web@WebCN:~ $ ping ipult.cz
> PING ipult.cz.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.031 ms
> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.035 ms
> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.028 ms
> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.028 ms
> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.030 ms
>
Given that there are 6-7000km from China to Czech Republic, your internet connection seems to be way faster than speed of light :-).
|
September 02, 2016 Re: vibed.org is down | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Nemanja Boric | On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 11:24:53 UTC, Nemanja Boric wrote:
> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 10:32:07 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>> web@WebCN:~ $ ping ipult.cz
>> PING ipult.cz.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119) 56(84) bytes of data.
>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.031 ms
>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.035 ms
>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.028 ms
>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.028 ms
>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.030 ms
>>
>
> Given that there are 6-7000km from China to Czech Republic, your internet connection seems to be way faster than speed of light :-).
Ah, this is actually pinging some host in China, not the CZ. Sorry!
|
September 02, 2016 Re: vibed.org is down | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Nemanja Boric | Wow :D, you are right
Dne 2.9.2016 v 13:24 Nemanja Boric via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 10:32:07 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>> web@WebCN:~ $ ping ipult.cz
>> PING ipult.cz.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119) 56(84) bytes of data.
>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.031 ms
>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.035 ms
>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.028 ms
>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.028 ms
>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.030 ms
>>
>
> Given that there are 6-7000km from China to Czech Republic, your internet connection seems to be way faster than speed of light :-).
>
|
September 02, 2016 Re: vibed.org is down | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Nemanja Boric | Dne 2.9.2016 v 13:26 Nemanja Boric via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 11:24:53 UTC, Nemanja Boric wrote:
>> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 10:32:07 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>>> web@WebCN:~ $ ping ipult.cz
>>> PING ipult.cz.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119) 56(84) bytes of data.
>>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.031 ms
>>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.035 ms
>>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.028 ms
>>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.028 ms
>>> 64 bytes from mail.eurocloud.cn (14.215.133.119): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.030 ms
>>>
>>
>> Given that there are 6-7000km from China to Czech Republic, your internet connection seems to be way faster than speed of light :-).
>
> Ah, this is actually pinging some host in China, not the CZ. Sorry!
This is better :)
web@WebCN:~ $ ping -s 65000 code.dlang.org
PING code.dlang.org (79.140.41.234) 65000(65028) bytes of data.
65008 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=314 ms
65008 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=314 ms
65008 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=314 ms
65008 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=314 ms
65008 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=314 ms
65008 bytes from rejectedsoftware.com (79.140.41.234): icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=314 ms
--- code.dlang.org ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 6 received, 14% packet loss, time 6513ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 314.219/314.405/314.653/0.736 ms
web@WebCN:~ $ ping -s 65000 mail.ipult.cz
PING mail.ipult.cz (37.205.11.135) 65000(65028) bytes of data.
65008 bytes from mail.ipult.cz (37.205.11.135): icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=243 ms
65008 bytes from mail.ipult.cz (37.205.11.135): icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=243 ms
65008 bytes from mail.ipult.cz (37.205.11.135): icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=243 ms
65008 bytes from mail.ipult.cz (37.205.11.135): icmp_seq=4 ttl=47 time=243 ms
65008 bytes from mail.ipult.cz (37.205.11.135): icmp_seq=5 ttl=47 time=243 ms
65008 bytes from mail.ipult.cz (37.205.11.135): icmp_seq=6 ttl=47 time=243 ms
65008 bytes from mail.ipult.cz (37.205.11.135): icmp_seq=7 ttl=47 time=243 ms
^C
--- mail.ipult.cz ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 7 received, 0% packet loss, time 6694ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 243.269/243.377/243.423/0.591 ms
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation