Thread overview | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 04, 2002 FG with DOSX | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 bit using -mx mode. I have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linker errors. After going through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zip from their BBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.) Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash Graphics in dosx mode? |
January 04, 2002 Re: FG with DOSX | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Rajiv Bhagwat | Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :
> I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 bit using -mx mode. I have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linker errors. After going through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zip from their BBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.)
>
> Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash Graphics in dosx mode?
There was already a discussion about FlashTek in c++.dos directory, subject:
FlashGraphics.
There seems to be a problem.
I don't know if it is solved.
good luck
Roland
|
January 09, 2002 Re: FG with DOSX | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Roland | Sorry Roland, even after setting Synchronization setting to 'All Messages' I am getting only 3 messages in c++.dos. If you have the previous message, kindly give me the short summary. (And any conclusions!) Thanks. - Rajiv "Roland" <rv@ronetech.com> wrote in message news:3C3576DA.53AFB81B@ronetech.com... > Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit : > > > I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 bit using -mx mode. > > I have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linker errors. After > > going through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zip from their > > BBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.) > > > > Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash Graphics in dosx > > mode? > > There was already a discussion about FlashTek in c++.dos directory, subject: > FlashGraphics. > There seems to be a problem. > I don't know if it is solved. > > good luck > > Roland > > |
January 09, 2002 Re: FG with DOSX | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Rajiv Bhagwat | Weird!
I am sure you're not the only one using MSO...
Jan
Rajiv Bhagwat wrote:
> Sorry Roland, even after setting Synchronization setting to 'All Messages' I am getting only 3 messages in c++.dos.
>
> If you have the previous message, kindly give me the short summary. (And any
> conclusions!) Thanks.
> - Rajiv
>
> "Roland" <rv@ronetech.com> wrote in message news:3C3576DA.53AFB81B@ronetech.com...
> > Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :
> >
> > > I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 bit using -mx
> mode.
> > > I have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linker errors.
> After
> > > going through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zip from
> their
> > > BBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.)
> > >
> > > Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash Graphics in
> dosx
> > > mode?
> >
> > There was already a discussion about FlashTek in c++.dos directory,
> subject:
> > FlashGraphics.
> > There seems to be a problem.
> > I don't know if it is solved.
> >
> > good luck
> >
> > Roland
> >
> >
|
January 10, 2002 Re: FG with DOSX | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jan Knepper | I'm having the same wierd problems. "Jan Knepper" <jan@smartsoft.cc> wrote in message news:3C3C6EC4.C578B3F2@smartsoft.cc... > Weird! > I am sure you're not the only one using MSO... > Jan > > > > Rajiv Bhagwat wrote: > > > Sorry Roland, even after setting Synchronization setting to 'All Messages' I > > am getting only 3 messages in c++.dos. > > > > If you have the previous message, kindly give me the short summary. (And any > > conclusions!) Thanks. > > - Rajiv > > > > "Roland" <rv@ronetech.com> wrote in message news:3C3576DA.53AFB81B@ronetech.com... > > > Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit : > > > > > > > I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 bit using -mx > > mode. > > > > I have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linker errors. > > After > > > > going through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zip from > > their > > > > BBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.) > > > > > > > > Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash Graphics in > > dosx > > > > mode? > > > > > > There was already a discussion about FlashTek in c++.dos directory, > > subject: > > > FlashGraphics. > > > There seems to be a problem. > > > I don't know if it is solved. > > > > > > good luck > > > > > > Roland > > > > > > > |
January 10, 2002 Re: FG with DOSX | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Rajiv Bhagwat |
Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :
> Sorry Roland, even after setting Synchronization setting to 'All Messages' I am getting only 3 messages in c++.dos.
>
> If you have the previous message, kindly give me the short summary. (And any
> conclusions!) Thanks.
> - Rajiv
>
> "Roland" <rv@ronetech.com> wrote in message news:3C3576DA.53AFB81B@ronetech.com...
> > Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :
> >
> > > I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 bit using -mx
> mode.
> > > I have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linker errors.
> After
> > > going through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zip from
> their
> > > BBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.)
> > >
> > > Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash Graphics in
> dosx
> > > mode?
> >
> > There was already a discussion about FlashTek in c++.dos directory,
> subject:
> > FlashGraphics.
> > There seems to be a problem.
> > I don't know if it is solved.
> >
> > good luck
> >
> > Roland
> >
> >
I don't understand the problem.
Do you want i send all the messages in c++.dos concerning FG ?
Roland
|
January 10, 2002 Re: FG with DOSX | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Roland | My simple question is : does anyone have 'fg_dosx.zip' ? As the file was freely available for download from the maker's BBS, I assume I am not breaking any laws by asking it. If there were any methods discussed (in the newsgroup) so that the I can use FGP.LIB without this file for -mx compiles, that would be helpful. Otherwise, I assume that the file would still be required for linking the missing symbols. - Rajiv "Roland" <rv@ronetech.com> wrote in message news:3C3D54D1.83955689@ronetech.com... > > Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit : > > > Sorry Roland, even after setting Synchronization setting to 'All Messages' I > > am getting only 3 messages in c++.dos. > > > > If you have the previous message, kindly give me the short summary. (And any > > conclusions!) Thanks. > > - Rajiv > > > > "Roland" <rv@ronetech.com> wrote in message news:3C3576DA.53AFB81B@ronetech.com... > > > Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit : > > > > > > > I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 bit using -mx > > mode. > > > > I have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linker errors. > > After > > > > going through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zip from > > their > > > > BBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.) > > > > > > > > Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash Graphics in > > dosx > > > > mode? > > > > > > There was already a discussion about FlashTek in c++.dos directory, > > subject: > > > FlashGraphics. > > > There seems to be a problem. > > > I don't know if it is solved. > > > > > > good luck > > > > > > Roland > > > > > > > > I don't understand the problem. > Do you want i send all the messages in c++.dos concerning FG ? > > Roland > > |
January 10, 2002 Re: FG with DOSX | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Rajiv Bhagwat | Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit : > My simple question is : does anyone have 'fg_dosx.zip' ? not me. > As the file was freely available for download from the maker's BBS, I assume I am not breaking any laws by asking it. > > If there were any methods discussed (in the newsgroup) so that the I can use FGP.LIB without this file for -mx compiles, that would be helpful. Otherwise, I assume that the file would still be required for linking the missing symbols. > > - Rajiv may be (i hope) you can ask Werner Hürttlen <w.huerttlen@fz-juelich.de> Roland |
January 10, 2002 Re: FG with DOSX | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Roland | Somebody gave me the originals of the FG disks a long time ago... I've got an FGDISK1.zip and FGDISK2.zip. I think this stuff is originally copyrighted by one of the Huffman brothers... I think it was Joe Huffman, Doug Huffman, http://www.dosextender.com/ , did the DOSX stuff. Roland wrote: > Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit : > > > My simple question is : does anyone have 'fg_dosx.zip' ? > > not me. > > > As the file was freely available for download from the maker's BBS, I assume I am not breaking any laws by asking it. > > > > If there were any methods discussed (in the newsgroup) so that the I can use FGP.LIB without this file for -mx compiles, that would be helpful. Otherwise, I assume that the file would still be required for linking the missing symbols. > > > > - Rajiv > > may be (i hope) you can ask > > Werner Hürttlen <w.huerttlen@fz-juelich.de> > > Roland |
January 11, 2002 Re: FG with DOSX | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jan Knepper | Thanks, Roland and Jan. I will proceed from the references. - Rajiv "Jan Knepper" <jan@smartsoft.cc> wrote in message news:3C3DDF72.5BF9D6C@smartsoft.cc... > Somebody gave me the originals of the FG disks a long time ago... > I've got an FGDISK1.zip and FGDISK2.zip. > I think this stuff is originally copyrighted by one of the Huffman brothers... > I think it was Joe Huffman, Doug Huffman, http://www.dosextender.com/ , did the > DOSX stuff. > > > > Roland wrote: > > > Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit : > > > > > My simple question is : does anyone have 'fg_dosx.zip' ? > > > > not me. > > > > > As the file was freely available for download from the maker's BBS, I assume > > > I am not breaking any laws by asking it. > > > > > > If there were any methods discussed (in the newsgroup) so that the I can use > > > FGP.LIB without this file for -mx compiles, that would be helpful. Otherwise, I assume that the file would still be required for linking the > > > missing symbols. > > > > > > - Rajiv > > > > may be (i hope) you can ask > > > > Werner Hürttlen <w.huerttlen@fz-juelich.de> > > > > Roland > |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation