Thread overview
TIOBE index - D is now 24th!
Mar 03, 2005
Dave
Mar 03, 2005
Ant
Mar 03, 2005
Dave
Mar 03, 2005
Knud Sørensen
Mar 04, 2005
Walter
Mar 04, 2005
Knud Sørensen
Mar 04, 2005
Nick Sabalausky
Mar 03, 2005
Walter
March 03, 2005
http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm

Slightly below VB.Net.

Just last month it was 29th:

http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?digitalmars.D/16533

Criticle mass?

- Dave


March 03, 2005
In article <d077e1$2roc$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Dave says...
>
>
>http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm
>
>Slightly below VB.Net.
>
>Just last month it was 29th:
>
>http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?digitalmars.D/16533
>
>Criticle mass?
>

I'm sorry but that index makes absolutly no sence.
I'm trying to promote D as much as the next guy but that's just wrong.
How is D more popular then RPG?!

"The ratings are based on the world-wide availability of skilled engineers, courses and third party vendors."

D does have "third party vendors" (GDC) but looses by far on the other
two criteria.

"The popular search engines Google, MSN, and Yahoo! are used to calculate the ratings."

That must be the problem, I guess they can't filter the false hits.

don't believe every thing you read on the internet.

Ant


March 03, 2005
In article <d07905$2tkn$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Ant says...
>
>In article <d077e1$2roc$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Dave says...
>>
>>
>>http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm
>>
>>Slightly below VB.Net.
>>
>>Just last month it was 29th:
>>
>>http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?digitalmars.D/16533
>>
>>Criticle mass?
>>
>
>I'm sorry but that index makes absolutly no sence.
>I'm trying to promote D as much as the next guy but that's just wrong.
>How is D more popular then RPG?!
>
>"The ratings are based on the world-wide availability of skilled engineers, courses and third party vendors."
>
>D does have "third party vendors" (GDC) but looses by far on the other
>two criteria.
>
>"The popular search engines Google, MSN, and Yahoo! are used to calculate the ratings."
>
>That must be the problem, I guess they can't filter the false hits.
>
>don't believe every thing you read on the internet.
>

No shit?!?

>
>Ant
>

The significant thing (which I pointed out) is that it is rising in this index, and this index is based primarily on search engine activity.

Was I trying to imply that D is in greater "real world" use than most of the other 'established' languages anywhere on that list? Of course not.

- Dave


March 03, 2005
I think that D gets the hits for 3-D programing also.

On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 15:03:33 +0000, Ant wrote:
> I'm sorry but that index makes absolutly no sence.
> I'm trying to promote D as much as the next guy but that's just wrong.
> How is D more popular then RPG?!
> 
> "The ratings are based on the world-wide availability of skilled engineers, courses and third party vendors."
> 
> D does have "third party vendors" (GDC) but looses by far on the other
> two criteria.
> 
> "The popular search engines Google, MSN, and Yahoo! are used to calculate the ratings."
> 
> That must be the problem, I guess they can't filter the false hits.
> 
> don't believe every thing you read on the internet.
> 
> Ant

March 03, 2005
"Ant" <Ant_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:d07905$2tkn$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> I'm sorry but that index makes absolutly no sence.
> I'm trying to promote D as much as the next guy but that's just wrong.
> How is D more popular then RPG?!

By using hits on google and yahoo, I think the index is a reasonable indicator of the 'buzz' surrounding a language. I can readilly believe that D has more buzz than RPG.


March 04, 2005
"Knud Sørensen" <12tkvvb02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:pan.2005.03.03.23.31.08.514990@sneakemail.com...
> I think that D gets the hits for 3-D programing also.

I shoulda called it the "Pamela Anderson" programming language, then we'd be number 1 :-)


March 04, 2005
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 16:04:33 -0800, Walter wrote:

> 
> "Knud Sørensen" <12tkvvb02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:pan.2005.03.03.23.31.08.514990@sneakemail.com...
>> I think that D gets the hits for 3-D programing also.
> 
> I shoulda called it the "Pamela Anderson" programming language, then we'd be number 1 :-)

Maybe we should make a Pamela Anderson's guide to D programming ;-)

Like Britney Spears guide to Semiconductor Physics http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm

March 04, 2005
"Knud Sørensen" <12tkvvb02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:pan.2005.03.04.12.38.08.402090@sneakemail.com...
> On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 16:04:33 -0800, Walter wrote:
>
>>
>> "Knud Sørensen" <12tkvvb02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:pan.2005.03.03.23.31.08.514990@sneakemail.com...
>>> I think that D gets the hits for 3-D programing also.
>>
>> I shoulda called it the "Pamela Anderson" programming language, then we'd
>> be
>> number 1 :-)
>
> Maybe we should make a Pamela Anderson's guide to D programming ;-)
>
> Like Britney Spears guide to Semiconductor Physics http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm
>

Continuing even further off-topic, that "Britney Spears guide to Semiconductor Physics" reminds me of MC Hawking's Crib:

http://www.mchawking.com/