February 14, 2008 Re: what IDE do you use? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Simen Kjaeraas | Under linux : gedit, with a terminal console. I love gedit, it is simple and beautiful. |
February 14, 2008 Re: what IDE do you use? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to BCS | BCS wrote:
> I uses a text editor (edit++) and the command prompt.
Since no one has mentioned it yet, I primarily use emacs + dsss. With C-x | bound to the "compile" command and C-x ` bound to "next-error" it's pretty sweet I think.
I've got my eye on the Editra and Peppy projects which both aim to be the Python equivalents of Emacs for the 21st century (in slightly different ways).
--bb
|
February 15, 2008 Re: what IDE do you use? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to BCS | Code::Blocks for something more complex and Kate for single-file programs. |
February 17, 2008 Re: what IDE do you use? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to BCS Attachments: | XEmacs + SCons on both Linux and Windows. I have yet to find an editor with the same advanced features as (X)Emacs (or vim, but (X)Emacs has a much easier learning curve). Jerome - -- +------------------------- Jerome M. BERGER ---------------------+ | mailto:jeberger@free.fr | ICQ: 238062172 | | http://jeberger.free.fr/ | Jabber: jeberger@jabber.fr | +---------------------------------+------------------------------+ |
February 20, 2008 Re: what IDE do you use? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to BCS | Chalk another vote up for vim + command line. My projects are small enough that I just compile them with dmd directly, but if I needed it, I probably would use dsss. If only vim had intellisense, I would not even ever consider using another editor ever again. -Steve |
March 23, 2008 Re: what IDE do you use? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to BCS | I use Mmrnmhrm. But I want to check out Descent 0.5 (which I haven't already because I've been busy), which introduces many of the features Mmrnmhrm has (specially code completion), and others more, which could make it preferable.
--
Bruno Medeiros - MSc in CS/E student
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D
|
March 23, 2008 Re: what IDE do you use? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Bruno Medeiros | Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> I use Mmrnmhrm. But I want to check out Descent 0.5 (which I haven't already because I've been busy), which introduces many of the features Mmrnmhrm has (specially code completion), and others more, which could make it preferable.
>
I use emacs with d-mode. I haven't tried Mmrnmhrm, but did try Descent. My project was large enough to uncover bugs out of the box (recommended solution: disable features). Reading the docs, I saw all features I was interested in (including code completion) had disclaimers about bugs. I set it down to wait for the next release.
|
April 27, 2008 Re: what IDE do you use? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jason House | Jason House wrote: > Bruno Medeiros wrote: > >> I use Mmrnmhrm. But I want to check out Descent 0.5 (which I haven't >> already because I've been busy), which introduces many of the features >> Mmrnmhrm has (specially code completion), and others more, which could >> make it preferable. >> > > I use emacs with d-mode. I haven't tried Mmrnmhrm, but did try Descent. My > project was large enough to uncover bugs out of the box (recommended > solution: disable features). Reading the docs, I saw all features I was > interested in (including code completion) had disclaimers about bugs. I > set it down to wait for the next release. What kind of bugs? Soft bugs like incorrect or missing matches, or harder bugs like IDE/editor crashes, OutOfMemory, error messages, etc? I tried Descent recently, but only on small code samples. I didn't try it in any large project, so I don't know how well it would stand up. For what I've seen, Descent code completion is now much more accurate than Mmrnmhrm's, but the overall IDE seems more unstable than before. -- Bruno Medeiros - Software Developer, MSc. in CS/E graduate http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D |
April 27, 2008 Re: what IDE do you use? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Bruno Medeiros | Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> Jason House wrote:
>> Bruno Medeiros wrote:
>>
>>> I use Mmrnmhrm. But I want to check out Descent 0.5 (which I haven't already because I've been busy), which introduces many of the features Mmrnmhrm has (specially code completion), and others more, which could make it preferable.
>>>
>>
>> I use emacs with d-mode. I haven't tried Mmrnmhrm, but did try Descent. My project was large enough to uncover bugs out of the box (recommended solution: disable features). Reading the docs, I saw all features I was interested in (including code completion) had disclaimers about bugs. I set it down to wait for the next release.
>
> What kind of bugs? Soft bugs like incorrect or missing matches, or harder bugs like IDE/editor crashes, OutOfMemory, error messages, etc?
>
> I tried Descent recently, but only on small code samples. I didn't try it in any large project, so I don't know how well it would stand up. For what I've seen, Descent code completion is now much more accurate than Mmrnmhrm's, but the overall IDE seems more unstable than before.
>
It's been quite a while, so I don't really remember. I definitely hit bugs with syntax highlighting, and marking code with compilation errors. I had a manageable bug with automatic code compilation. That last one was also fixed rather quickly, but the other two reduced Descent to being about as helpful as any other text editor :(
|
April 27, 2008 Re: what IDE do you use? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jason House | Jason House escribió:
> Bruno Medeiros wrote:
>
>> Jason House wrote:
>>> Bruno Medeiros wrote:
>>>
>>>> I use Mmrnmhrm. But I want to check out Descent 0.5 (which I haven't
>>>> already because I've been busy), which introduces many of the features
>>>> Mmrnmhrm has (specially code completion), and others more, which could
>>>> make it preferable.
>>>>
>>> I use emacs with d-mode. I haven't tried Mmrnmhrm, but did try Descent. My project was large enough to uncover bugs out of the box (recommended
>>> solution: disable features). Reading the docs, I saw all features I was
>>> interested in (including code completion) had disclaimers about bugs. I
>>> set it down to wait for the next release.
>> What kind of bugs? Soft bugs like incorrect or missing matches, or
>> harder bugs like IDE/editor crashes, OutOfMemory, error messages, etc?
>>
>> I tried Descent recently, but only on small code samples. I didn't try
>> it in any large project, so I don't know how well it would stand up. For
>> what I've seen, Descent code completion is now much more accurate than
>> Mmrnmhrm's, but the overall IDE seems more unstable than before.
>>
>
> It's been quite a while, so I don't really remember. I definitely hit bugs
> with syntax highlighting, and marking code with compilation errors. I had
> a manageable bug with automatic code compilation. That last one was also
> fixed rather quickly, but the other two reduced Descent to being about as
> helpful as any other text editor :(
That already changed in trunk. Really, I applied the new approach I described in some other post, and evertyhing started working much accurately, smoothly, and without bugs (well, I also wrote a lot of unit tests which were missing before). It is much, much more stable now. We hope to release soon. :-)
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation