Thread overview | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
July 29, 2014 Voting: std.logger | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
x-post http://forum.dlang.org/post/vbotavcclttrgvzcjjia@forum.dlang.org |
August 17, 2014 Re: Voting: std.logger | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Dicebot | On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 05:12:04 UTC, Dicebot wrote: > x-post > http://forum.dlang.org/post/vbotavcclttrgvzcjjia@forum.dlang.org Results: http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger#Voting_for_std.experimental tl; dr: concept approved but exact API needs work before it is ready for std.experimental, further discussions has moved to GitHuuntil it is ready. Important: I have adjusted some of votes based on new inclusion criteria defined by Andrei. If vote stated "Yes" but listed clear API change requirements, it was counted as "No". Please have a look at the vote list to make sure I have not interpreted anything wrong. |
August 18, 2014 Re: Voting: std.logger | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Dicebot | On Sunday, 17 August 2014 at 02:55:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote: > Results: > http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger#Voting_for_std.experimental Seems like my vote (http://forum.dlang.org/post/anzeespykooeiaqisfjg@forum.dlang.org) went missing – not that it would change anything, of course (later in the thread, I pointed out some other (since fixed) issues, which was the more important part). I probably should've included 1) and 2) as separate bullet points to make counting easier. Cheers, David |
August 18, 2014 Re: Voting: std.logger | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to David Nadlinger | On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 20:51:48 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 August 2014 at 02:55:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> Results:
>> http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger#Voting_for_std.experimental
>
> Seems like my vote (http://forum.dlang.org/post/anzeespykooeiaqisfjg@forum.dlang.org) went missing – not that it would change anything, of course (later in the thread, I pointed out some other (since fixed) issues, which was the more important part). I probably should've included 1) and 2) as separate bullet points to make counting easier.
>
> Cheers,
> David
Sorry! Unfortunately everyone keeps ignoring me asking to not start discussions in voting threads and some votes may slip through my attention :(
Updated.
|
August 19, 2014 Re: Voting: std.logger | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Dicebot | On Sunday, 17 August 2014 at 02:55:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> Results:
> http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger#Voting_for_std.experimental
The link to the team-phobos page doesn't work for me, so I'm not entirely sure what it is (list of users with commit rights?), but in any case, I don't think I'm on any such list (I don't have commit rights for Phobos).
|
August 19, 2014 Re: Voting: std.logger | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jakob Ovrum | On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 21:23:20 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 August 2014 at 02:55:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> Results:
>> http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger#Voting_for_std.experimental
>
> The link to the team-phobos page doesn't work for me, so I'm not entirely sure what it is (list of users with commit rights?), but in any case, I don't think I'm on any such list (I don't have commit rights for Phobos).
There was a mail list vote recently about adding you to Phobos commiters and remembering no objections I just presumed it has already happened :O (It should have been!)
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation