On Friday, 14 March 2014 at 10:56:21 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
> On Friday, 14 March 2014 at 09:47:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 3/14/14, 1:44 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
>>> Fixing phobos bugs probably is quite easier for a D user. You just need
>>> to know phobos and D to fix a bug and you don't need compiler-related
>>> topics. I think that in this case a small reward could fight the
>>> lazyness of users.
>>
>> Good point. Then let's choose a set of important Phobos bugs for putting bounties on.
>>
>> Andrei
>
> You should launch a poll "select your top-five phobos bugs to fix"

All one has to do is take the time to vote in bugzilla.  The vote tally appears to be automatically reflected in Bounty Source.

On Friday, 14 March 2014 at 23:54:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 3/14/14, 11:43 AM, Dicebot wrote:
>> When can we expect first upstream pull requests done from Facebook
>> camp? :P
>
> Soon enough.
>
> Andrei

This is one of best D-related things I have heard lately.
Looking forward to it!

On 3/15/14, Dicebot <public@dicebot.lv> wrote:
> This is one of best D-related things I have heard lately. Looking forward to it!

They'll get to experience that fast pull/review/merge cycle we're so used to. :P

On 13/03/2014 18:20, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> https://www.bountysource.com/issues/1325905-shared-phobos-library-doesn-t-work-on-all-linux-distributions
>
>
> Over $2000 in open bounties left:
>
> https://www.bountysource.com/trackers/383571-d-programming-language
>
> https://www.bountysource.com/trackers/455080-gdc
>
> https://www.bountysource.com/trackers/283332-ldc
>
>
>
> Andrei

I've added a bounty for GDC to produce Windows binary releases!
https://www.bountysource.com/issues/1523615-build-script-and-infrastructure-to-produce-and-release-windows-binaries

-- 
Bruno Medeiros
https://twitter.com/brunodomedeiros

On 03/13/2014 07:40 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> Looks like most of these are on compiler bugs.
>
> The only Phobos one is the std.getopt one, however its situation is
> two abandoned patches and no clear goal as to what constitutes a
> change worthy of marking the issue as "fixed" and paying out the bounty.
I made another PR for that one.