On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 18:35:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> With this we revoke Martin's role as release czar. His github access will remain the same for the time being.

I think that was unnecessarily harsh and unilateral, not to mention demotivating (to both Martin and any people who considered the role). What do you mean by "for the time being" exactly?

> We are therefore looking for a new release czar.

I would like to ask, what can we improve in our tooling and infrastructure to lessen the burden on release czars? I know nightly builds have been discussed for years, and it would be great to take advantage of the multi-platform infrastructure of the current autotester for it, but it doesn't look like that's going to happen.

On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 16:16:09 UTC, berlin wrote:
> well, read something to your world situation. take it from an old kufr that dos not want to live under islamic law:
>
> http://www.jihadwatch.org/
> http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
> http://www.barenakedislam.com/
> http://schnellmann.org/Understanding_Muhammad_Contents.html
>
> you might also want to take a closer look at "taqiyya" - that is why nobody can trust a muslim.

Hi, I am new to this concept, Off wiki:

"There is a consensus that whomsoever is forced into apostasy and chooses death has a greater reward than a person who takes the license [to deny one's faith under duress], but if a person is being forced to eat pork or drink wine, then they should do that [instead of choosing death]."

Then, can one not logically deduce that if anyone tries to kill muslims, such as the US invading them that they should, if they are not willing to fight and die, they should do **whatever** is forced upon them(until that time which they are willing to die)?

e.g., the U.S. could force 99% of Muslims to do "X" and they will do it(by the above logic), e.g., the statement uses pork and whine but they are just examples, it is open ended.


Now why did the U.S. not do that when we invaded a Muslim country the first 10 times? Is it ignorance(I got the power of that belief 1 min after opening the wiki page, surely there are many smarter people working in the U.S. government than me?) or intentional?

You know how politicians are extremely good at conning the public and wiggling there fingers in to every crevice? How they start off easy, like a sheep, then the next thing you know, you've just been bitten in to?

Surely that skill could have been used on the Muslim wars? Start off with making them teach English and Mathematics in their schools. Force them to submit to such "basic" things. Once your in, your in.... if you really cared to be in, in the first place.

There are many more Americans benefiting from the continuation of wars than there are that are not. The dead soldiers do not count, nor do their families and friends because only the rich and powerful matter. I'm curious to what percentage of men who are rich by birth join the front lines versus those that are poor? War is just the governments way of "spring cleaning". If we really cared about solving the problem we would just assassinate and bomb the crap out of them. Force the fearing Muslims to turn in the non-fearing ones... kill the non-fearing ones. Problem solved... well, again, unless you don't see a problem with the status quo.

I personal opinion is that most muslims as most africans are a bit further back in the development cycle... But since we all came from the same monkey queen I think diversity is good as it helps keep us one step ahead of all the stuff trying to kill us. It would be nice if we could all just get over this "I'm better than you" bullshit that doesn't solve anything. Your mother sucks balls, but do you put her down for it? Yes, many blacks(percentage wise) are quantitatively retarded when measured again the whole, but what good does that do.

I guess a better thing for humanity is simply require everyone to marry outside their race... after a few generations we can move on to real problems that face humanity rather than bickering about who as the biggest dicks. (since everyone will have the biggest dicks and smallest dicks simultaneously, since all will have nearly identical genetic material. Of course, those who masturbate more might have bigger or smaller dicks depending on which scientific publications you read)

Of course, then we'll be all sick from having no immunity from all the bugs that have learned to eat us.

On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 22:16:37 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail@erdani.org> wrote:
> We are therefore looking for a new release czar.

On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 22:53:59 -0400, Morbid.Obesity <Morbid.Obesity@mail.com> wrote:
> Of course, then we'll be all sick from having no immunity from all the bugs that have learned to eat us.

I don't think digression quite covers this.. I vote we coin a new term.

  Bit

On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 18:35:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I'm very happy Martin is doing well but I am disappointed about this unprofessional behavior. In fact I could only assume the worst […]

You thought he was dead?

O_o

I can virtually picture thousands of volunteers lining up now…

On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 01:34:32 UTC, Etienne wrote:
> To be fair it does sound like he was asking for it. I wouldn't provoke an armed man who's holding my 4 yr old captive. I mean, the young ones have been butchered in War since before mankind. War is Hell. This stuff has happened recently, I haven't finished holding my breath over reading about Nanking Massacre on Wikipedia the other day.

Before he took up arms, Banda was a saint. He took up arms only to protect religious freedom of fellow Indians. So in a way he asked for it. But had he (and many others) not done that, much of India would have been like Iraq and Syria of today.

A few decades before Banda's sacrifice is the sacrifice of Bhai Matidas and Bhai Satidas (just for example -- there are innumerable more). They were not even warriors. But since they refused conversion, in full public view, one was enveloped in cotton and put to fire, and the other framed in wooden planks and sawed vertically thus splitting his body in two.

An estimate says that India lost 90 million lives in the last 1000 years fighting this insane idea of religious superiority that many followers of this cult carry.

This is my last post on this forum on this topic. I am sorry to have breached the sanctity of a technical forum in this way.

> I understand the feeling, but that seems unnecessarily harsh to demote Martin, since he is the one that have done the most for release, and it yielded actual results.

Indeed.

On 18/06/2015 3:48 p.m., dnewbie wrote:
>> I understand the feeling, but that seems unnecessarily harsh to demote
>> Martin, since he is the one that have done the most for release, and
>> it yielded actual results.
>
> Indeed.

+1 and I do not do so/say so lightly.

On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 02:22:13 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 18:35:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> With this we revoke Martin's role as release czar. His github access will remain the same for the time being.
>
> I think that was unnecessarily harsh and unilateral, not to mention demotivating (to both Martin and any people who considered the role). What do you mean by "for the time being" exactly?
>
>> We are therefore looking for a new release czar.
>
> I would like to ask, what can we improve in our tooling and infrastructure to lessen the burden on release czars? I know nightly builds have been discussed for years, and it would be great to take advantage of the multi-platform infrastructure of the current autotester for it, but it doesn't look like that's going to happen.

Sorry for this post but...
Is it possible to remove disscusiion about relligions, nationalities and relations of them?
This is international forum and we may allow only one kind of intolerance: we may hate programmers, which doesn't use D yet.

I am surprised that disscussion, started by one troll passersby, doesn't stopped now.
Camrades, do not answer to troll posts. Just ignore it. I do not understand how something can be to try to answer such posts dripping fat as that from which it started.

On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 02:54:00 UTC, Morbid.Obesity wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 16:16:09 UTC, berlin wrote:
>> well, read something to your world situation. take it from an old kufr that dos not want to live under islamic law:
>>
>> http://www.jihadwatch.org/
>> http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
>> http://www.barenakedislam.com/
>> http://schnellmann.org/Understanding_Muhammad_Contents.html
>>
BTW, I think, our troll just advertised his resources. It was the main his goal.

On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 04:25:07 UTC, IgorStepanov wrote:
> On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 02:54:00 UTC, Morbid.Obesity wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 16:16:09 UTC, berlin wrote:
>>> well, read something to your world situation. take it from an old kufr that dos not want to live under islamic law:
>>>
>>> http://www.jihadwatch.org/
>>> http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
>>> http://www.barenakedislam.com/
>>> http://schnellmann.org/Understanding_Muhammad_Contents.html
>>>
> BTW, I think, our troll just advertised his resources. It was the main his goal.

A couple of them said they're done, no need to kick the beehive again.