August 13, 2011
  Branch: refs/heads/master
  Home:   https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos

  Commit: d1d22d13723f07834817f3a283ea6cbd62807fe0
      https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/d1d22d13723f07834817f3a283ea6cbd62807fe0
  Author: Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at erdani.com>
  Date:   2011-08-13 (Sat, 13 Aug 2011)

  Changed paths:
    M std/parallelism.d

  Log Message:
  -----------
  Merge pull request #190 from dsimcha/master

AsyncBuf Overload For Buffer Recycling


August 14, 2011
I'd like the community's opinions on this one:  Is it worth creating std.stdio.PipelinedLineReader and PipelinedChunkReader that use the std.parallelism.asyncBuf API in an encapsulated way and present a safer, more convenient interface for some specific cases of the idiom shown in the asyncBuf example, or would this just be bloat?

On 8/14/2011 2:44 AM, noreply at github.com wrote:
>    Branch: refs/heads/master
>    Home:   https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
>
>    Commit: d1d22d13723f07834817f3a283ea6cbd62807fe0
>        https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/d1d22d13723f07834817f3a283ea6cbd62807fe0
>    Author: Andrei Alexandrescu<andrei at erdani.com>
>    Date:   2011-08-13 (Sat, 13 Aug 2011)
>
>    Changed paths:
>      M std/parallelism.d
>
>    Log Message:
>    -----------
>    Merge pull request #190 from dsimcha/master
>
> AsyncBuf Overload For Buffer Recycling
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>