August 13, 2011 [phobos] [D-Programming-Language/phobos] d1d22d: Merge pull request #190 from dsimcha/master | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos Commit: d1d22d13723f07834817f3a283ea6cbd62807fe0 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/d1d22d13723f07834817f3a283ea6cbd62807fe0 Author: Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at erdani.com> Date: 2011-08-13 (Sat, 13 Aug 2011) Changed paths: M std/parallelism.d Log Message: ----------- Merge pull request #190 from dsimcha/master AsyncBuf Overload For Buffer Recycling |
August 14, 2011 [phobos] [D-Programming-Language/phobos] d1d22d: Merge pull request #190 from dsimcha/master | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to noreply at github.com | I'd like the community's opinions on this one: Is it worth creating std.stdio.PipelinedLineReader and PipelinedChunkReader that use the std.parallelism.asyncBuf API in an encapsulated way and present a safer, more convenient interface for some specific cases of the idiom shown in the asyncBuf example, or would this just be bloat?
On 8/14/2011 2:44 AM, noreply at github.com wrote:
> Branch: refs/heads/master
> Home: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
>
> Commit: d1d22d13723f07834817f3a283ea6cbd62807fe0
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/d1d22d13723f07834817f3a283ea6cbd62807fe0
> Author: Andrei Alexandrescu<andrei at erdani.com>
> Date: 2011-08-13 (Sat, 13 Aug 2011)
>
> Changed paths:
> M std/parallelism.d
>
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Merge pull request #190 from dsimcha/master
>
> AsyncBuf Overload For Buffer Recycling
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation