Thread overview
[phobos] pull request statistics
Jan 19, 2012
Brad Roberts
Jan 19, 2012
kenji hara
Jan 19, 2012
Brad Roberts
Jan 19, 2012
Walter Bright
Jan 19, 2012
Brad Roberts
January 18, 2012
Since we moved to github...

            total  open
  dmd        615    58
  druntime   396    14
  phobos     132    25

Of the open requests, the pull auto-tester stats.

            pass  fail
  dmd         36    22
  druntime     8     7
  phobos       9    16

fail == at least one platform fails to build
pass == so far, this pass of the tester, nothing has yet failed

At least linux/64 has run for each pull request.  Three of the tests will likely convert from pass to fail when other platforms catch up.  Personally, I'm not worried about the ones that fail all that much as there's still plenty to do with those that do pass.  Just reporting on the statistics.

Later,
Brad
January 19, 2012
Some pulls should make combinations, but current tester doesn't support to combine them, so they always fail.

Example:
- dmd/387	9rnsr/constApply
- druntime/72	9rnsr/constApply
- phobos/262	9rnsr/constApply

The three pulls require the changes each other.

Kenji Hara

2012/1/19 Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com>:
> Since we moved to github...
>
> ? ? ? ? ? ?total ?open
> ?dmd ? ? ? ?615 ? ?58
> ?druntime ? 396 ? ?14
> ?phobos ? ? 132 ? ?25
>
> Of the open requests, the pull auto-tester stats.
>
> ? ? ? ? ? ?pass ?fail
> ?dmd ? ? ? ? 36 ? ?22
> ?druntime ? ? 8 ? ? 7
> ?phobos ? ? ? 9 ? ?16
>
> fail == at least one platform fails to build
> pass == so far, this pass of the tester, nothing has yet failed
>
> At least linux/64 has run for each pull request. ?Three of the tests will likely convert from pass to fail when other platforms catch up. ?Personally, I'm not worried about the ones that fail all that much as there's still plenty to do with those that do pass. ?Just reporting on the statistics.
>
> Later,
> Brad
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
January 18, 2012
Yeah.  There's at least one more set like that.

On Jan 18, 2012, at 6:36 PM, kenji hara <k.hara.pg at gmail.com> wrote:

> Some pulls should make combinations, but current tester doesn't support to combine them, so they always fail.
> 
> Example:
> - dmd/387    9rnsr/constApply
> - druntime/72    9rnsr/constApply
> - phobos/262    9rnsr/constApply
> 
> The three pulls require the changes each other.
> 
> Kenji Hara
> 
> 2012/1/19 Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com>:
>> Since we moved to github...
>> 
>>            total  open
>>  dmd        615    58
>>  druntime   396    14
>>  phobos     132    25
>> 
>> Of the open requests, the pull auto-tester stats.
>> 
>>            pass  fail
>>  dmd         36    22
>>  druntime     8     7
>>  phobos       9    16
>> 
>> fail == at least one platform fails to build
>> pass == so far, this pass of the tester, nothing has yet failed
>> 
>> At least linux/64 has run for each pull request.  Three of the tests will likely convert from pass to fail when other platforms catch up.  Personally, I'm not worried about the ones that fail all that much as there's still plenty to do with those that do pass.  Just reporting on the statistics.
>> 
>> Later,
>> Brad
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
January 18, 2012
Please include d-programming-language.org in these stats.

On 1/18/2012 6:29 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:
> Since we moved to github...
>
>              total  open
>    dmd        615    58
>    druntime   396    14
>    phobos     132    25
>
> Of the open requests, the pull auto-tester stats.
>
>              pass  fail
>    dmd         36    22
>    druntime     8     7
>    phobos       9    16
>
> fail == at least one platform fails to build
> pass == so far, this pass of the tester, nothing has yet failed
>
> At least linux/64 has run for each pull request.  Three of the tests will likely convert from pass to fail when other platforms catch up.  Personally, I'm not worried about the ones that fail all that much as there's still plenty to do with those that do pass.  Just reporting on the statistics.
>
> Later,
> Brad
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>
>
January 18, 2012
total: 62
open: 8

The total vs open count is trivially available through github, for what it's worth.  It show's open counts and when sorting by submitted date (the default I believe, it is for me), the first one's link contains the highest current request number.

There's no pull pass/fail results for that set.

On 1/18/2012 6:56 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> Please include d-programming-language.org in these stats.
> 
> On 1/18/2012 6:29 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:
>> Since we moved to github...
>>
>>              total  open
>>    dmd        615    58
>>    druntime   396    14
>>    phobos     132    25
>>
>> Of the open requests, the pull auto-tester stats.
>>
>>              pass  fail
>>    dmd         36    22
>>    druntime     8     7
>>    phobos       9    16
>>
>> fail == at least one platform fails to build
>> pass == so far, this pass of the tester, nothing has yet failed
>>
>> At least linux/64 has run for each pull request.  Three of the tests will likely convert from pass to fail when other platforms catch up.  Personally, I'm not worried about the ones that fail all that much as there's still plenty to do with those that do pass.  Just reporting on the statistics.
>>
>> Later,
>> Brad