Thread overview | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 18, 2012 [phobos] pull request statistics | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Since we moved to github... total open dmd 615 58 druntime 396 14 phobos 132 25 Of the open requests, the pull auto-tester stats. pass fail dmd 36 22 druntime 8 7 phobos 9 16 fail == at least one platform fails to build pass == so far, this pass of the tester, nothing has yet failed At least linux/64 has run for each pull request. Three of the tests will likely convert from pass to fail when other platforms catch up. Personally, I'm not worried about the ones that fail all that much as there's still plenty to do with those that do pass. Just reporting on the statistics. Later, Brad |
January 19, 2012 [phobos] pull request statistics | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Brad Roberts | Some pulls should make combinations, but current tester doesn't support to combine them, so they always fail.
Example:
- dmd/387 9rnsr/constApply
- druntime/72 9rnsr/constApply
- phobos/262 9rnsr/constApply
The three pulls require the changes each other.
Kenji Hara
2012/1/19 Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com>:
> Since we moved to github...
>
> ? ? ? ? ? ?total ?open
> ?dmd ? ? ? ?615 ? ?58
> ?druntime ? 396 ? ?14
> ?phobos ? ? 132 ? ?25
>
> Of the open requests, the pull auto-tester stats.
>
> ? ? ? ? ? ?pass ?fail
> ?dmd ? ? ? ? 36 ? ?22
> ?druntime ? ? 8 ? ? 7
> ?phobos ? ? ? 9 ? ?16
>
> fail == at least one platform fails to build
> pass == so far, this pass of the tester, nothing has yet failed
>
> At least linux/64 has run for each pull request. ?Three of the tests will likely convert from pass to fail when other platforms catch up. ?Personally, I'm not worried about the ones that fail all that much as there's still plenty to do with those that do pass. ?Just reporting on the statistics.
>
> Later,
> Brad
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
|
January 18, 2012 [phobos] pull request statistics | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to kenji hara | Yeah. There's at least one more set like that.
On Jan 18, 2012, at 6:36 PM, kenji hara <k.hara.pg at gmail.com> wrote:
> Some pulls should make combinations, but current tester doesn't support to combine them, so they always fail.
>
> Example:
> - dmd/387 9rnsr/constApply
> - druntime/72 9rnsr/constApply
> - phobos/262 9rnsr/constApply
>
> The three pulls require the changes each other.
>
> Kenji Hara
>
> 2012/1/19 Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com>:
>> Since we moved to github...
>>
>> total open
>> dmd 615 58
>> druntime 396 14
>> phobos 132 25
>>
>> Of the open requests, the pull auto-tester stats.
>>
>> pass fail
>> dmd 36 22
>> druntime 8 7
>> phobos 9 16
>>
>> fail == at least one platform fails to build
>> pass == so far, this pass of the tester, nothing has yet failed
>>
>> At least linux/64 has run for each pull request. Three of the tests will likely convert from pass to fail when other platforms catch up. Personally, I'm not worried about the ones that fail all that much as there's still plenty to do with those that do pass. Just reporting on the statistics.
>>
>> Later,
>> Brad
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
|
January 18, 2012 [phobos] pull request statistics | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Brad Roberts | Please include d-programming-language.org in these stats.
On 1/18/2012 6:29 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:
> Since we moved to github...
>
> total open
> dmd 615 58
> druntime 396 14
> phobos 132 25
>
> Of the open requests, the pull auto-tester stats.
>
> pass fail
> dmd 36 22
> druntime 8 7
> phobos 9 16
>
> fail == at least one platform fails to build
> pass == so far, this pass of the tester, nothing has yet failed
>
> At least linux/64 has run for each pull request. Three of the tests will likely convert from pass to fail when other platforms catch up. Personally, I'm not worried about the ones that fail all that much as there's still plenty to do with those that do pass. Just reporting on the statistics.
>
> Later,
> Brad
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>
>
|
January 18, 2012 [phobos] pull request statistics | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | total: 62
open: 8
The total vs open count is trivially available through github, for what it's worth. It show's open counts and when sorting by submitted date (the default I believe, it is for me), the first one's link contains the highest current request number.
There's no pull pass/fail results for that set.
On 1/18/2012 6:56 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> Please include d-programming-language.org in these stats.
>
> On 1/18/2012 6:29 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:
>> Since we moved to github...
>>
>> total open
>> dmd 615 58
>> druntime 396 14
>> phobos 132 25
>>
>> Of the open requests, the pull auto-tester stats.
>>
>> pass fail
>> dmd 36 22
>> druntime 8 7
>> phobos 9 16
>>
>> fail == at least one platform fails to build
>> pass == so far, this pass of the tester, nothing has yet failed
>>
>> At least linux/64 has run for each pull request. Three of the tests will likely convert from pass to fail when other platforms catch up. Personally, I'm not worried about the ones that fail all that much as there's still plenty to do with those that do pass. Just reporting on the statistics.
>>
>> Later,
>> Brad
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation