February 08, 2002 Re: D and XML (was: DDJ, D, XML, HTML, ECMAScript, DOM, etc., etc.) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Russell Borogove | "Russell Borogove" <kaleja@estarcion.com> wrote in message news:3C48B248.7070206@estarcion.com... > It's not impossible, but given that D > is currently a one-man effort (though Pavel is certainly starting > to make it look like a two-man effort), it's not going to happen > this year. The trouble is, while the downloads of the compiler are very popular, too few wind up buying the CD to make it possible to hire someone. Should I start selling t-shirts? <g> |
February 08, 2002 Re: D and XML (was: DDJ, D, XML, HTML, ECMAScript, DOM, etc., etc.) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Russell Borogove | "Russell Borogove" <kaleja@estarcion.com> wrote in message news:3C48E461.6060708@estarcion.com... > You've done a fair amount of work getting legacy libraries usable in D, and you've reported far more bugs than anyone else. I haven't even invoked the damn compiler yet, shameful to admit. I myself find it impossible to play with a language, I need a project to do with it. Perhaps you're the same way. I can list some projects <g>. |
February 09, 2002 Re: D and XML (was: DDJ, D, XML, HTML, ECMAScript, DOM, etc., etc.) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:a41oer$2se5$9@digitaldaemon.com... > The trouble is, while the downloads of the compiler are very popular, too few wind up buying the CD to make it possible to hire someone. > > Should I start selling t-shirts? <g> Yeah, a good idea. With D logo and the text "C++ suxx!" on the back =) |
February 09, 2002 Re: D and XML (was: DDJ, D, XML, HTML, ECMAScript, DOM, etc., etc.) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | Walter wrote:
> "Russell Borogove" <kaleja@estarcion.com> wrote in message
> news:3C48E461.6060708@estarcion.com...
>
>>You've done a fair amount of work getting legacy libraries
>>usable in D, and you've reported far more bugs than anyone
>>else. I haven't even invoked the damn compiler yet, shameful
>>to admit.
>>
>
> I myself find it impossible to play with a language, I need a project to do
> with it. Perhaps you're the same way. I can list some projects <g>.
Unfortunately, my brain got swallowed up by some audio DSP
software projects, and unless I want to port the Steinberg
VST API to D... hm, well, I suppose I could try...
-Russell B
|
February 09, 2002 Re: D and XML (was: DDJ, D, XML, HTML, ECMAScript, DOM, etc., etc.) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Pavel Minayev | Pavel Minayev wrote:
> "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message
> news:a41oer$2se5$9@digitaldaemon.com...
>
>
>>The trouble is, while the downloads of the compiler are very popular, too
>>few wind up buying the CD to make it possible to hire someone.
>>
>>Should I start selling t-shirts? <g>
>>
>
> Yeah, a good idea. With D logo and the text "C++ suxx!" on the
> back =)
Heh, I was thinking they should have the "Just what I need,
another D in programming" quote.
FWIW, if the T-shirt was reasonably cool-looking, preferably
white on black to go with the rest of my wardrobe, I'd buy
one. :)
-RB
|
February 09, 2002 Re: D and XML (was: DDJ, D, XML, HTML, ECMAScript, DOM, etc., etc.) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Russell Borogove | "Russell Borogove" <kaleja@estarcion.com> wrote in message news:3C658E5D.9000004@estarcion.com... > FWIW, if the T-shirt was reasonably cool-looking, preferably white on black to go with the rest of my wardrobe, I'd buy one. :) Personally I'd prefer red on black, with a pentagram or two =) |
February 10, 2002 Re: D and XML (was: DDJ, D, XML, HTML, ECMAScript, DOM, etc., etc.) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Pavel Minayev | Pavel Minayev wrote:
> "Russell Borogove" <kaleja@estarcion.com> wrote in message news:3C658E5D.9000004@estarcion.com...
>
> > FWIW, if the T-shirt was reasonably cool-looking, preferably white on black to go with the rest of my wardrobe, I'd buy one. :)
>
> Personally I'd prefer red on black, with a pentagram or two =)
Cyan on magenta would rock. And be sure to enable blinking text!
When conversation switches to T-shirts, the language must already be becoming a mainstream fad.
Time to start working on D++.
-BobC
"The next thing you C will be D."
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation