Thread overview | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
February 23, 2004 STL vs. STLport (And <string>) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
I am trying to figureout the differences between the already included STL and STLport. Is STLport more standards compliant? faster? Also, how do I use the Standard C++ string library? If I use <string.h>, I get the C library, If I use <string>, I get an error. Thanks, Kevin |
February 23, 2004 Re: STL vs. STLport (And <string>) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Kevin Albrecht | "Kevin Albrecht" <kevin@albrecht.net> wrote in message news:c1bmj0$29bk$1@digitaldaemon.com... > I am trying to figureout the differences between the already included STL and STLport. Is STLport more standards compliant? faster? Use STLport, as the other is no longer supported. > Also, how do I use the Standard C++ string library? If I use <string.h>, I get the C library, If I use <string>, I get an error. Compile with: -I\dm\stlport\stlport |
February 23, 2004 Re: STL vs. STLport (And <string>) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:c1c4kg$31a4$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > Use STLport, as the other is no longer supported. Am I right in thinking that STLport doesn't work with dos-extended applications? (Because of its unquenchable desire for the presence of various Unicode functions) If so, is there now no 'official' route for using and STL library in 32-bit DOS applications? Thanks, Will |
February 23, 2004 Re: STL vs. STLport (And <string>) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Will Dean | "Will Dean" <will@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:c1cg9d$ks7$1@digitaldaemon.com... > "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:c1c4kg$31a4$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > > Use STLport, as the other is no longer supported. > > Am I right in thinking that STLport doesn't work with dos-extended applications? (Because of its unquenchable desire for the presence of various Unicode functions) Yes. DOS, unfortunately, doesn't do unicode. > If so, is there now no 'official' route for using and STL library in 32-bit > DOS applications? You can still use STL on that. |
February 24, 2004 Re: STL vs. STLport (And <string>) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:c1dgje$2el7$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > Yes. DOS, unfortunately, doesn't do unicode. Sure. And I don't want to either! (In this app...) It's a pity that STLport creates this artificial dependency. (Not your fault, I know) > You can still use STL on that. Thanks. Cheers, Will |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation