Thread overview
STL vs. STLport (And <string>)
Feb 23, 2004
Kevin Albrecht
Feb 23, 2004
Walter
Feb 23, 2004
Will Dean
Feb 23, 2004
Walter
Feb 24, 2004
Will Dean
February 23, 2004
I am trying to figureout the differences between the already included STL and STLport.  Is STLport more standards compliant? faster?

Also, how do I use the Standard C++ string library?  If I use <string.h>, I get the C library, If I use <string>, I get an error.

Thanks,
Kevin


February 23, 2004
"Kevin Albrecht" <kevin@albrecht.net> wrote in message news:c1bmj0$29bk$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> I am trying to figureout the differences between the already included STL and STLport.  Is STLport more standards compliant? faster?

Use STLport, as the other is no longer supported.

> Also, how do I use the Standard C++ string library?  If I use <string.h>, I get the C library, If I use <string>, I get an error.

Compile with:
    -I\dm\stlport\stlport


February 23, 2004
"Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:c1c4kg$31a4$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>
> Use STLport, as the other is no longer supported.

Am I right in thinking that STLport doesn't work with dos-extended applications?  (Because of its unquenchable desire for the presence of various Unicode functions)

If so, is there now no 'official' route for using and STL library in 32-bit DOS applications?

Thanks,

Will



February 23, 2004
"Will Dean" <will@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:c1cg9d$ks7$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:c1c4kg$31a4$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> >
> > Use STLport, as the other is no longer supported.
>
> Am I right in thinking that STLport doesn't work with dos-extended applications?  (Because of its unquenchable desire for the presence of various Unicode functions)

Yes. DOS, unfortunately, doesn't do unicode.

> If so, is there now no 'official' route for using and STL library in
32-bit
> DOS applications?

You can still use STL on that.


February 24, 2004
"Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:c1dgje$2el7$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>
> Yes. DOS, unfortunately, doesn't do unicode.

Sure. And I don't want to either!  (In this app...)

It's a pity that STLport creates this artificial dependency.  (Not your
fault, I know)

> You can still use STL on that.

Thanks.

Cheers,

Will