Jump to page: 1 25  
Page
Thread overview
The best environment for D
Jan 22, 2005
nail
Jan 22, 2005
Matthew
Jan 22, 2005
zwang
Jan 22, 2005
zwang
Jan 22, 2005
nail
Jan 22, 2005
John Reimer
Jan 22, 2005
nail
Jan 22, 2005
John Reimer
Jan 23, 2005
Paul Bonser
Jan 23, 2005
John Reimer
Jan 23, 2005
Paul Bonser
Jan 22, 2005
Chris Sauls
Jan 22, 2005
clayasaurus
Jan 22, 2005
Huang Yicheng
Jan 22, 2005
Asaf Karagila
Jan 22, 2005
David L. Davis
Jan 22, 2005
Lukas Pinkowski
Jan 22, 2005
Rod Haper
Jan 22, 2005
Charles
Jan 22, 2005
Anders Runesson
Jan 22, 2005
Charles
Jan 22, 2005
Anders Runesson
Jan 22, 2005
Ben Hinkle
Jan 23, 2005
Anders Runesson
Jan 23, 2005
John Demme
Jan 27, 2005
Charles
Jan 22, 2005
Sebastian Beschke
Jan 22, 2005
h3r3tic
Jan 22, 2005
Lars Ivar Igesund
Jan 23, 2005
Walter
Jan 23, 2005
zwang
Jan 23, 2005
Walter
Jan 23, 2005
Rod Haper
Jan 23, 2005
Walter
Jan 23, 2005
David Medlock
Jan 23, 2005
Nick Sabalausky
Jan 23, 2005
Nick Sabalausky
Jan 23, 2005
Carotinho
Jan 24, 2005
John Demme
Re: The best environment for D (demangler)
Jan 24, 2005
Carotinho
Jan 25, 2005
Brian Chapman
Jan 27, 2005
Georg Wrede
Jan 27, 2005
Zz
January 22, 2005
Hi all.

You can treat this topic as a poll. I think this can help begginers to choose
convenient tools to use D and advanced programmers to try something new and
compare with already used tools. So, the question is: what tools and
applications do you use for D programming:
1) Platform
2) Editor
3) Build system
4) Debugger
5) Profiler
6) Others

As for me, my replies are:
1) Win32
2) Programmers notepad 2 (www.pnotepad.org) - simple opensource editor with
native D syntax highlight support and ability to call external tools like
builder
3) SCons (www.scons.org)
4) None. I use printf where I need, 'cause I couldn't force any debugger to work
with D
5) None. See (4) :)


January 22, 2005
"nail" <nail_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:cstfa2$t0$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Hi all.
>
> You can treat this topic as a poll. I think this can help begginers to choose
> convenient tools to use D and advanced programmers to try something new and
> compare with already used tools. So, the question is: what tools and
> applications do you use for D programming:
> 1) Platform
> 2) Editor
> 3) Build system
> 4) Debugger
> 5) Profiler
> 6) Others
>
> As for me, my replies are:

1) Win32, soon to be Linux
2) Visual Studio '98 and/or gvim
3) make
4) none
5) none




January 22, 2005
nail wrote:

> So, the question is: what tools and
> applications do you use for D programming:

> 1) Platform
Mac OS X. (Darwin)
Fedora Core. (Linux)

> 2) Editor
BBEdit. (or Xcode)
Nano.

> 3) Build system
Make. (or Xcode)

> 4) Debugger
GDB. (or Xcode)

> 5) Profiler
Shark. (CHUD 4)
http://developer.apple.com/tools/shark_optimize.html

> 6) Others

Compilers:
GCC 3.3
GDC 0.10

Packaging:
RPM 4.3

Others:
Perl 5.8
Lots of GNU tools. (diff, patch, bash, wget, etc)

--anders
January 22, 2005
nail wrote:
> Hi all.
> 
> You can treat this topic as a poll. I think this can help begginers to choose
> convenient tools to use D and advanced programmers to try something new and
> compare with already used tools. So, the question is: what tools and
> applications do you use for D programming:
> 1) Platform
> 2) Editor
> 3) Build system
> 4) Debugger
> 5) Profiler
> 6) Others
> 
> As for me, my replies are:
> 1) Win32
> 2) Programmers notepad 2 (www.pnotepad.org) - simple opensource editor with
> native D syntax highlight support and ability to call external tools like
> builder
> 3) SCons (www.scons.org)
> 4) None. I use printf where I need, 'cause I couldn't force any debugger to work
> with D
> 5) None. See (4) :)
> 
> 

1) Win32
2) Visual Studio 98
3) make
4) Visual Studio 98
5) none
January 22, 2005
zwang wrote:
> nail wrote:
> 
>> Hi all.
>>
>> You can treat this topic as a poll. I think this can help begginers to choose
>> convenient tools to use D and advanced programmers to try something new and
>> compare with already used tools. So, the question is: what tools and
>> applications do you use for D programming:
>> 1) Platform
>> 2) Editor
>> 3) Build system
>> 4) Debugger
>> 5) Profiler
>> 6) Others
>>
>> As for me, my replies are:
>> 1) Win32
>> 2) Programmers notepad 2 (www.pnotepad.org) - simple opensource editor with
>> native D syntax highlight support and ability to call external tools like
>> builder
>> 3) SCons (www.scons.org)
>> 4) None. I use printf where I need, 'cause I couldn't force any debugger to work
>> with D
>> 5) None. See (4) :)
>>
>>
> 
> 1) Win32
> 2) Visual Studio 98
> 3) make
> 4) Visual Studio 98
> 5) none

BTW, PN2(2.5.34) does not seem to support D natively.  I had to write a customized scheme for D.
January 22, 2005
nail wrote:
> Hi all.
> 
> You can treat this topic as a poll. I think this can help begginers to choose
> convenient tools to use D and advanced programmers to try something new and
> compare with already used tools. So, the question is: what tools and
> applications do you use for D programming:
> 1) Platform
> 2) Editor
> 3) Build system
> 4) Debugger
> 5) Profiler
> 6) Others
> 
> As for me, my replies are:
> 1) Win32
> 2) Programmers notepad 2 (www.pnotepad.org) - simple opensource editor with
> native D syntax highlight support and ability to call external tools like
> builder
> 3) SCons (www.scons.org)
> 4) None. I use printf where I need, 'cause I couldn't force any debugger to work
> with D
> 5) None. See (4) :)
> 
> 

1) WinXP and Gentoo Linux
2) Scite (windows), Eclipse (windows), Scite (Linux), Kate (Linux), experimenting with gvim (Linux)
3) dmd/gcc 3.4.3 (linking), experimenting with "dmake" and "build" on Linux
4) sometimes gdb (Linux), periodically Valgrind (Linux)
5) none
6) Eclipse D plugin was quite "fun" and practical to use but too buggy for my purposes, so I gave up on it (both Windows and Linux); I have tried Scons for building - I am mildly impressed, but I'd rather have a tool that doesn't rely on a full Python installation, is d specific, and is standalone (ie, dmake or build).

Later,

John R.
January 22, 2005
>
>BTW, PN2(2.5.34) does not seem to support D natively.  I had to write a customized scheme for D.

Hm.. I've download the same version but it does :)


January 22, 2005
In article <cstfa2$t0$1@digitaldaemon.com>, nail says...
>1) Platform
>2) Editor
>3) Build system
>4) Debugger
>5) Profiler
>6) Others

1) Win32/NT, Linux
2) EditPlus (Win32), nano (Linux)
3) SCons, at least until something D-particular comes along
4) none
5) none

-- Chris Sauls


January 22, 2005
1) yoper and mepis linux
2) kate
3) dmake
4) want to use gdb, but havn't yet. used writef though
5) none
6) none

In article <cstfa2$t0$1@digitaldaemon.com>, nail says...
>
>Hi all.
>
>You can treat this topic as a poll. I think this can help begginers to choose
>convenient tools to use D and advanced programmers to try something new and
>compare with already used tools. So, the question is: what tools and
>applications do you use for D programming:
>1) Platform
>2) Editor
>3) Build system
>4) Debugger
>5) Profiler
>6) Others
>
>As for me, my replies are:
>1) Win32
>2) Programmers notepad 2 (www.pnotepad.org) - simple opensource editor with
>native D syntax highlight support and ability to call external tools like
>builder
>3) SCons (www.scons.org)
>4) None. I use printf where I need, 'cause I couldn't force any debugger to work
>with D
>5) None. See (4) :)
>
>


January 22, 2005
>Eclipse D plugin was quite "fun" and practical to use but too buggy for my purposes, so I gave up on it (both Windows and Linux); I have tried Scons for building - I am mildly impressed, but I'd rather have a tool that doesn't rely on a full Python installation, is d specific, and is standalone (ie, dmake or build).

I tried to use eclipse. It's great platform as it, but eclipseD - not. About a week I discovered structure of CDT plugin (for C/C++ development) with aim to remake it for D. But because I don't know Java language higher then read-only, the attempt was of course failed :). If somebody might to refactor CDT in DDT it would be so great - editor, outline, build, debug (gdb based) in one place for win32 and linux simultaneously plus count of external useful plugins. But alas it just a dream for nearest year or two, ehhh... pity.


« First   ‹ Prev
1 2 3 4 5