bug fixing

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.026.zip

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.010.zip

Walter Bright wrote:
> bug fixing
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.026.zip
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.010.zip

"""
Bugs Fixed
    * Bugzilla 1319: compiler crashes with functions that take const ref arguments
"""

Hooray!  At long last!  Maybe it's time to try D2 for real now.  :-)

--bb

Walter Bright schrieb:
> bug fixing
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.026.zip
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.010.zip

I really really want to try D2, but even if tango moved to D2...
There is still this problem, that it is not possible to turn the full-closure-heap-alloc off. The is, for me, a show stopper. I cannot allow heap alloc, and i make massive use of in-place delegates that are passed into called functions.

I hope so much for a solution (scope?) in the next release.

Frank

Walter Bright Wrote:

> bug fixing
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.026.zip
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.010.zip

Hello!

Is the pure keyword for functions?  Where is the documentation for it?  Shouldn't it be listed in the keyword list? (at http://www.digitalmars.com/d/lex.html)

Thanks for this release!

i guess "pure" is not functional in any way yet. its just a reserved keyword from now on (like "macro" is for already a looong time)


Pablo Ripolles schrieb:
> Walter Bright Wrote:
>
>   
>> bug fixing
>>
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.026.zip
>>
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.010.zip
>>     
>
> Hello!
>
> Is the pure keyword for functions?  Where is the documentation for it?  Shouldn't it be listed in the keyword list? (at http://www.digitalmars.com/d/lex.html)
>
> Thanks for this release!
>
>   

ohh what a great day for const, #1319 was in top ten for me ;). thanks for this release!

but what happened to scoped interfaces:
[CODE]

interface IFoo {
}

class Foo : IFoo {}

IFoo getaFoo(){
   return new Foo();
}

void main() {
   scope auto a = getaFoo();
}

[/CODE]

this is illegal since 2.010. how can i do such a thing from now on ?


Walter Bright schrieb:
> bug fixing
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.026.zip
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.010.zip

Walter Bright schrieb:
> bug fixing
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.026.zip
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.010.zip

"
opAssign can no longer be overloaded for class objects.
"

why is that ? that change breaks lots of my code... ;(

Bill Baxter wrote:
> """
> Bugs Fixed
>     * Bugzilla 1319: compiler crashes with functions that take const ref arguments
> """
> 
> Hooray!  At long last!  Maybe it's time to try D2 for real now.  :-)

I was waiting on fixing that until the const stuff settled down.

Walter Bright wrote:
> bug fixing
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.026.zip
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.010.zip

If a variable is declared both private and export, I get 'redundant protection attribute' with 2.010.  Do private and export really exclude each other?  It's sometimes useful, although private seem to be ignored when you use export.  I agree that they are conceptually mutually exclusive, but private has limited effect in D, and export only changes the name mangling, AFAIK.  Just wondering. :)

torhu wrote:
> If a variable is declared both private and export, I get 'redundant protection attribute' with 2.010.  Do private and export really exclude each other?  It's sometimes useful, although private seem to be ignored when you use export.  I agree that they are conceptually mutually exclusive, but private has limited effect in D, and export only changes the name mangling, AFAIK.  Just wondering. :)

Yes, they are meant to be mutually exclusive.